I agree. He did for the President what he could legitimately and legally do. He couldn’t make things up for the President’s benefit.
Sessions was ghastly. If he didn’t think he could make decisions on the collusion accusations, he should have immediately offered to withdraw.

The lack of report is the report.

Sessions did the right thing by recusing himself from the Russia probe.
And he got blasted for it.
Barr wrote a completely partisan report.
Sessions knows what the job is. Barr doesn’t give a ■■■■■
Simple really.

1 Like

I dont know. I think barr balanced a fine line. He did send armed agents to polling places. He did tell them to look into anything credible.
I still think the mail in ballots are suspicious. But as far as barr, I think he went as far as he could go.

No, he definitely did not.

What are you talking about?

Yes, I’m aware of the memo.

He didn’t actually do it, though.

Thus the memo clearly shows they could go. I am not sure why semantics should always have to be argued.

I missed the Rahm Emmanuelle Attorney General period.

Pretty simple. Barr believes his primary job is to protect the president.

Sessions couldn’t go that far.

Barr is worse.

That’s not what the word semantics means. He didn’t send them anywhere. That’s not semantics

1 Like

Who told you they they have cancelled the report? Link? Did they say they would file it as per tnt’s timeline? :rofl:

Lynch. She refused to prosecute Killary or at least reprimand/shame her for gross neglect regarding Benghazi.

1 Like