Who shot Ashli Babbitt?

[FreeAndClear]

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

@zantax

@FreeAndClear

@zantax

@toreyj01

@Samm

@toreyj01

@Samm

Is that what Q believes? How do you know that? Are you Q?

1. Yes
2. They said so
3. No

Who said so? Is that in their charter?

It seems you don’t know a lot about Qanon, and I count that as a plus for you. Glad you haven’t fallen down this rabbit hole many of your fellow Conservatives have. I am hoping this is all a fad but it may just be a harbinger for the next fraudulent movement.

I don’t understand why some Cons are being targeted with these conspiracies and why they seem to take hold so well with them, Libs are prone to flights of fancy as well (9/11 truthers come to mind) but not to the extent that they invade the US Capital building to stop certification of a perfectly legitimate election, all on the basis of lies and nonsense.

There has to be something at play which makes these folks vulnerable to manipulation. Some say they are anxious about the changing demographics of the country and their perceived loss of power, I don’t know if that is true but it seems palpable.

He says while studiously ignoring over a year of leftist violence and destruction.

The violence is not justified but it’s part of something.

The Q following and the radicalization behind it is based in imagination.

Just look at the last post by a Q supporter in this thread

Systemic racism is imaginary.

Its omnipresence is yes i agree. That’s not the only reason for the protests.

Cops killing people for being black epidemic, also imaginary.

Locally. It certainly is not. It’s not only killing, it’s mistreatment. The idiotic protest chant of defund the police isn’t defund the police only in black neighborhoods. They are going after mistreatment.

[gooddad409]

@zantax

@toreyj01

@Samm

@toreyj01

@Samm

Is that what Q believes? How do you know that? Are you Q?

1. Yes
2. They said so
3. No

Who said so? Is that in their charter?

It seems you don’t know a lot about Qanon, and I count that as a plus for you. Glad you haven’t fallen down this rabbit hole many of your fellow Conservatives have. I am hoping this is all a fad but it may just be a harbinger for the next fraudulent movement.

I don’t understand why some Cons are being targeted with these conspiracies and why they seem to take hold so well with them, Libs are prone to flights of fancy as well (9/11 truthers come to mind) but not to the extent that they invade the US Capital building to stop certification of a perfectly legitimate election, all on the basis of lies and nonsense.

There has to be something at play which makes these folks vulnerable to manipulation. Some say they are anxious about the changing demographics of the country and their perceived loss of power, I don’t know if that is true but it seems palpable.

He says while studiously ignoring over a year of leftist violence and destruction.

[Camp]

Only in DC and only when the claim can be made that super important people were saved without showing proof.

[gooddad409]

@Camp

Only in DC and only when the claim can be made that super important people were saved without showing proof.

Yeah that makes sense…to libs.

[FreeAndClear]

@Camp

Only in DC and only when the claim can be made that super important people were saved without showing proof.

So they weren’t in the capitol? The very important people that is… what proof would suffice?

[FreeAndClear]

@Oldandtired

But i see that only leftist see these Q people and know what they are up to. Now why is that?

Not sure seeing them. I don’t know how much YouTube you watch probably not much.

As to what they are upto. Same answer.

Though they have been banned from YouTube… some lost over 2m followers.

[Camp]

Any proof would be a start.

Pelosi bragged that she wasn’t personally concerned.

[FreeAndClear]

@Camp

Any proof would be a start.

Pelosi bragged that she wasn’t personally concerned.

So we are not taking the word of a person in authority anymore?

[Camp]

The problem has become too political.

To the core of election and power.

We the people are to be answered.

[FreeAndClear]

@Camp

The problem has become too political.

To the core of election and power.

We the people are to be answered.

What problem?

The election was decided when the storm came.

They even said so.

[DougBH]

@FreeAndClear

Locally. It certainly is not. It’s not only killing, it’s mistreatment. The idiotic protest chant of defund the police isn’t defund the police only in black neighborhoods. They are going after mistreatment.

There is no “locally” when terrorists try to burn federal buildings in Seattle and Oregon over some cherry picked incident in Minneapolis.
That is not a cause, it is an excuse.
Chauvin’s criminal actions authorized them to do nothing.

[FreeAndClear]

@DougBH

@FreeAndClear

Locally. It certainly is not. It’s not only killing, it’s mistreatment. The idiotic protest chant of defund the police isn’t defund the police only in black neighborhoods. They are going after mistreatment.

There is no “locally” when terrorists try to burn federal buildings in Seattle and Oregon over some cherry picked incident in Minneapolis.
That is not a cause, it is an excuse.
Chauvin’s criminal actions authorized them to do nothing.

Nothing authorizes violence. I understood it for about 5 mins of it when Floyd was first killed.

What it immediately turned into (not that anyone should have had any doubt that it would) is a free for all

The underlying cause is righteous. The violence surrounding it is not.

[Camp]

Full disclosure on who and why Babbitt was killed.

Capitol police saying it was OK isn’t going to suffice.

We can wait for R majority…likely will have to now.

[FreeAndClear]

@Camp

Full disclosure on who and why Babbitt was killed.

Capitol police saying it was OK isn’t going to suffice.

We can wait for R majority…likely will have to now.

We know why, i don’t think they should be keeping the who from the public

On January 6 the former President was still president.

[DougBH]

The cause was power and rage and love of destruction, not righteousness.
Righteousness, aka virtue signaling, was the lame excuse.
If someone says they are burning down a building for world peace, I am not accepting that the cause is righteous, or that peace is really even the cause.

[FreeAndClear]

@DougBH

The cause was power and rage and love of destruction, not righteousness.
Righteousness, aka virtue signaling, was the lame excuse.
If someone says they are burning down a building for world peace, I am not accepting that the cause is righteous, or that peace is really even the cause.

Power rage and love all neatly fit into righteousness. It’s subjective. Highly

I am talking about the protests in general. The violence surrounding them comes with the protests of course and that’s why there is no excuse for it. Clean up your (the protestors) house

[Camp]

That former President recommended more security and was rebuffed…politics.

[FreeAndClear]

@Camp

That former President recommended more security and was rebuffed…politics.

I am not talking about his role in protecting the capitol or the narrative of what he did and didn’t do

I am talking about the investigation into who and why that you asked for.

[Camp]

I need it to be bipartisan.

Too much has been sensationalized or downplayed depending on perspective.

Just looking at what we know…shooting her under those conditions was dumbfounding.

[FreeAndClear]

@Camp

I need it to be bipartisan.

Too much has been sensationalized or downplayed depending on perspective.

Just looking at what we know…shooting her under those conditions was dumbfounding.

Yeah downplayed is a good way to describe what’s going on in this thread for sure.