So then, why release the names of cops who shoot unarmed black men? We have ample evidence of the potential violence that that leads to. Perhaps all cops who shoot unarmed suspects should be protected with anonymity.

3 Likes

You two are both projecting. You cannot predict how ultra conservatives will react by looking at how ultra libs react.

1 Like

So then, why was Ashli the only one shot?

3 Likes

Wow! I would have never pegged you for a ā€œkill ā€˜em allā€ sort of guy.

Wow. Making ā– ā– ā– ā–  up again, hu?

LoL. I’m projecting ultra cons actions like trying to kidnap and kill the Governor of Michigan. I’m projecting conservatives chanting ā€œHang Mike Pence.ā€ I’m channeling folks here trying hard to make Ashli an innocent victim and martyr for the cause. It’s no leap to think your side, riled up extremists, will be chomping at the bit for revenge on the State and officer.

Nope … just drawing logical conclusions from the position you have taken in your posts here.

Oh? Did the Governor of Michigan shoot someone? I stand corrected.

:roll_eyes:

Odd you take this stance when the point is about naming cops who are involved in fatal shootings. Why is it your right to know the name of any cop who shoots an unarmed black person, but it’s not our right to know the name of this man? Are not all of those other cops potentially at risk too?

2 Likes

It is kind of ironic how folks who espouse Q conspiracies accuse folks on the Left of parroting communistic sentiments. In fact, in the lead up to the 2020 elections Communist China and sort of Communist Russia were pushing Q theories on US social media to stir dissent.

So, if anyone is parroting communistic sentiments, it isn’t the Left but some on the Right doing it. Albeit they are unaware of who is lying to them, so I suppose it doesn’t matter much to them.

1 Like

I still find it so far some on the Right have fallen down the rabbit hole. The GOP used to stand for gun rights, anti-abortion, low taxes and low regulations. Now? I don’t honestly think they stand for much at all. No ideas, no vision, just conspiracies, outrage and anger. Lots of anger.

This was an actual attack on the US Capital, by a mob, which killed a police officer. Which threatened the life of the Republican Vice President of the United States. And some folks here are actually upset about the one person the Capital Police shot, who was breeching a barricade put in place to protect said Veep and Congresspeople.

Almost 1300 posts deifying a woman so lost to reality she invaded and violated the halls of Congress, a woman who served her country for 14 years. But she was also a broken person before being lulled into the conspiratorial world of Q and Trump supporters, she became radicalized and did what was previously unthinkable to her and became a traitor to the country she loved and served.

And here we see folks who lionize her tragic death, as if she was the victim of a crime instead of a criminal being stopped from doing further harm.

How far will some on the Right fall? How far is too far? Because apparently insurrection isn’t too deep a hole to drop down into. Does democracy even matter? Does the United States even matter if the folks on the Right lose an election? I actually wonder about these things, how far will some on the Right take this?

3 Likes

Samm, I demonstrating that there are extremists on your side that are attempting to take extreme actions. ā€œHang Mike Penceā€

Like I said, you guys are working quite hard to turn Ashli into a martyr. It’s no stretch to connect your extremists with that.

As to the name, as I said earlier, it should be released at some point.

Because the Capitol Police are not required to release that information. Local police departments are.

He says blithely as the left continuously pursue insurrection.

2 Likes

The rest had a change of heart about breaking down that door when she got shot.

Oops. Sorry. I initially read that as moronic.

It really isn’t too much to ask that the same standard applies to all officers of the law or that this gentleman must have the same standards applied to him?

1 Like

You’re wasting your breath.

Diversity only applies if it is the new ā€œthingā€. Like the latest pair of sneakers or handbag.

Send out the social wokies. I mean workers.

1 Like

That seemed obvious.

Quote one.

What does that have to do with the fact that every other cop who shoots someone has their name made public regardless of the potential danger that may put them in? What do you think this thread is about?