You have misunderstood my question. What were his orders to Ashli that she was allegedly shot for ignoring?

1 Like

Oh sorry. I have watched multiple videos and in all of them the audio is from the perspective of outside of the doorway. In all of them I did not hear him speak any orders towards her. And I have not read anything that suggested that he said anything to her before firing the shot. Was that legal? I don’t know what the law is pertaining to that. Should he have? Yes I believe he should have given her a warning. Would it have changed her actions? No, I don’t believe so since it appears on the video that she was being pushed into the lobby when he shot her. I believe that he could have yelled at her but that was not going to stop her from going into the lobby.

At the time of the incident, I heard that he had uttered the words “the first person through that window will be shot.” But I have never seen or heard anything to indicate that she or anyone else on her side of the door heard him.

1 Like

From the video it was pretty loud on her side. There was a lot of stuff going on with those guys who were breaking out the windows. These guys were pissed and the restraint by the officers guarding the doors was pretty incredible. And I can understand why the officer in the lobby really didn’t know what was going on. One minute the officers on the other side of the door were there and then they were gone. Apparently
they were aware that the task force was coming up the stairs, but the officer inside the lobby did not know that. So it appears that the communication was a mess. It was reported that the officer who shot her was aware that shots had been fired and that angry mobs were breaking in. I think that he was very scared. Does that justify his actions? No. But one thing that is clear in the videos that I have watched, everything happened really fast. Sometimes it is difficult when life doesn’t happen in slow motion like we see on TV.

But Westaussie came through in the elections fraud thread.

“Unequivocally the person shot would not have been shot if they were not in the Capitol building. That fact is not influenced at all if the person was armed or unarmed. It is completely irrelevant whether the person was armed or unarmed.”

Is that the standard to use for George Floyd and Wright, too?

1 Like

She never had a chance to do so…was never in custody. Shot like a dog so Pelosi could call the trespass deadly.

All propaganda to take your freedom.

1 Like

Collected the bounty for. dead Trumper so Pelosi could call the event deadly.

She didn’t know there would also be a stroke and heart attack that day. The shoot made sure death was there.

You are allowed to, I do it all the time.

It’s easy.

Allan

It sounds like you are saying the shot was premeditated or ordered in some way. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

…and yet, here’s the officer’s picture and name plastered all over the news and YOU don’t care about that. There’s a double standard being applied and it’s all regarding wokeness, instead of an equal policy being applied to all. How many death threats do you think she’ll get from left wing extremists intent on violence while being portrayed at the sheople troughs as “mostly peaceful”? Notice that the first thing mentioned…THE FIRST THING MENTIONED…is the color of her skin. These are SICK times and the left-wing media is being severely manipulating events around the country as one side is fine, while the other is always in the wrong. Wake up and recognize how we’re all being played.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minnesota-officer-who-killed-daunte-wright-resigns-along-with-police-chief/ar-BB1fCpQN

6 Likes

There is a different history, isn’t there? Let’s not forget the plot against Whitmer, or the pipe bombs at the Capitol, for example.

Defender of the Temple of 'Mocracy. Slayer of Trumpists. First of His Name We Don’t Know.

4 Likes

There is no training for that.

No, there isn’t a different history.

3 Likes

Sounds like a new precedent for dealing with rioters in general doesn’t it?

Well you know the old saying about libs…if not for double standards.

1 Like

Is there? Let’s not forget that almost every single time, ALMOST EVERY SINGLE TIME…that an officer shoots someone, the victim FIRST…directly disobeyed a police order and created an environment that severely increased the probability of the officers’ lives being in danger. How about this case? Does it match what I just said?

Now consider Ashley Babbit’s case; there were many officers with in a few feet of her, allowing the window to be broken and not attempting to stop anyone or anything. They didn’t consider their lives being threatened in anyway! Then an officer on the other side, who is hidden and their life is NOT IN DANGER decides to just SHOOT her and you don’t see a problem with that? My gosh…the double standards are just plain sickening and so many intelligent people on the left have become sheoplized woke.

4 Likes

Yes, it does. Glad we agree.

…that you’ve become sheoplized woke. Thanks. :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

Why don’t we wait for the results of the investigation before we assume?