Look it up yourself.

I didn’t claim to be good with words either.

1 Like

does it matter? She was breaking the law.

1 Like

Reason enough to shoot her in the neck?

So was Eric Garner. So was George Floyd. So was Jacob Brooks.

1 Like

Which I already said was tragic. They shouldn’t have been there actively committing a crime threatening those that were trapped. It doesn’t change the fact that using this incident to draw an equivalency between other LEO involved shootings is disingenuous.

1 Like

It’s not “tragic”, how could it be “tragic”?

Threatening? Her? Unarmed? I’d love to see it.

“He” killed “her” for what “they” said?

1 Like

If we can kill unarmed people by shooting them in the neck, I’m fine with it. I just want to know the rules.

So far I got:

  • White
  • Woman
  • Part of a mob
  • Climbing over chairs

I miss anything?

The police could have had a field day at the Pink Hat March.

1 Like

That a lot of quotes Sneak. It is tragic when someone loses their life especially when they were mislead by someone emboldening them. It’s tragic whether I agreed with her politics or not. See how easy that is.

Sadly, still a justified shoot.

She didn’t “lose” her life. Her life was taken. Snatched from her.

Why do you think she was misled?

1 Like

And rationalized, as we can see.

1 Like

Ask yourself this, was Breonna Taylor’s murder justified?

Nope…that was an epic screw up.

It’s how this works.

It’s BLM’s fault that Trump supporters attacked the Capitol.

1 Like

How was it not? The first shot fired was by an armed member of a mob. Now that’s a lethal threat. Even drew blood.

1 Like

Her government was being stolen by election fraud. It’s all over her social media.

No it’s not.

How is that misleading her? 25% of the country believes it.

That’s not consistency. It’s gross oversimplification.

Ummm…it was a legal firearm by someone who thought their home was being invaded. That’s not the topic though. We were discussing whether Babbitt was a clean shoot or not.