So Then why the concern about who shot her?

Allan

I was wondering if someone would catch the error in that post…

1 Like

I don’t think that they do think it was unjustified.

I think it is performance.

And now the roles are reversed, aren’t they?

Hmm…it’s almost like one’s standards depend upon one’s political philosophy.

Thank you Allan!

Some don’t follow orders and are killed because of it and unrest happens because of it! Always back the blue!

Or you could be in the middle and not like any of it! And just chalk it up as crazies exist in this world.

Do you mean condemn? Condone means quite the opposite.

I suspect it is a typo.

Given the context, obviously is.

1 Like

That’s true. I would say the violence of Jan 6th was a drop in the bucket compared to a whole year of violence the year before however.

A year of violence the left seemed to have no problem with. A wink and a nod to that year of ā€œloveā€. :roll_eyes:

2 Likes

Don’t get so deep. :sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

Because as Americans, we are accustomed to that information being public. If it isn’t doesn’t that make them hmm, secret police?

1 Like

The violence of Jan 6th happened because a President of the United States was for months actively trying to overturn an election that he lost.

Let us please not pretend that that isn’t something new in this country.

Someone slept through Bush v Gore.

If a black person is shot by a police officer they DEMAND to know who it was immediately.

Since it was a conservative this time they want to keep it secret. :roll_eyes:

Woke libs are amazing. :crazy_face:

1 Like

Which sitting President was trying to overturn an election that they lost?

Gore. Wasn’t a sitting President but, that’s not very relevant.

He was a sitting President?

see edit, if the challenger can contest, so can the incumbent.

1 Like