what do you know, changing the subject to keep playing game.
when did I ever want to avoid acknowledging black people who support Trump?
what do you know, changing the subject to keep playing game.
when did I ever want to avoid acknowledging black people who support Trump?
that has to be an 9.9 for sticking the landing like that
Sheer perfection
But i see that only leftist see these Q people and know what they are up to. Now why is that?
Is there a point there I should respond to?
enki: Samm:What do you know … There are those Blacks for Trump that you never want to acknowledge.
what do you know, changing the subject to keep playing game.
when did I ever want to avoid acknowledging black people who support Trump?
Is there a point there I should respond to?
not a very clever trick.
But i see that only leftist see these Q people and know what they are up to. Now why is that?
only leftists…
Suddenly there was a flurry of Q posts listing Democrat and Republicans who were/are in deep legal trouble. Copy and pasting might be overkill so here is the link. Long Lists of names and brief info. https://qposts.online/
But i see that only leftist see these Q people and know what they are up to. Now why is that?
Because we do our homework. And good luck at trying to stick Q on the left side. It really makes you look silly.
Samm: enki: Samm:What do you know … There are those Blacks for Trump that you never want to acknowledge.
what do you know, changing the subject to keep playing game.
when did I ever want to avoid acknowledging black people who support Trump?
Is there a point there I should respond to?
not a very clever trick.
Not a trick at all.
enki: Samm: enki: Samm:What do you know … There are those Blacks for Trump that you never want to acknowledge.
what do you know, changing the subject to keep playing game.
when did I ever want to avoid acknowledging black people who support Trump?
Is there a point there I should respond to?
not a very clever trick.
Not a trick at all.
indeed.
“Insurrectionists” and “terrorists” tried to break into the Oklahoma state Senate chamber because they didn’t like a bill that was being approved. Should some hero cop have shot the first one touching the door to stop them?
I have a problem with these bills that allow drivers to hit protesters without punishment
I have a problem with these bills that allow drivers to hit protesters without punishment
I can’t even believe that’s a real thing. There’s no way they survive a court challenge.
PurpnGold:I have a problem with these bills that allow drivers to hit protesters without punishment
I can’t even believe that’s a real thing. There’s no way they survive a court challenge.
I just hope I’m missing something with those bills. I haven’t seen the actual bills yet.
I just hope I’m missing something with those bills. I haven’t seen the actual bills yet.
Two states have passed them. I know that. Utah or something and somewhere in Dixie.
I have a problem with these bills that allow drivers to hit protesters without punishment
I have not seen a copy of the actual proposed bill. However, breaking into the capitol building to stop the legislative process is clearly insurrection…or so I have heard.
I have a problem with these bills that allow drivers to hit protesters without punishment
Here’s a little more detail, though certainly not a quote from the bill.
“The bill would make it misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail and a $5,000 fine for anyone who blocks the use of a public street. The measure would also grant a motorist criminal and civil immunity if they kill or injure someone while fleeing from a riot.”
That would appear to say if you don’t want to be at risk from someone fleeing, don’t create a riot.
Just saw a little more. NOt only do they have to be fleeing from a riot but the death or injury caused must be unintentional. Some stories are leaving out significant portions of what the bill is about.
Is anyone surprised?
More:
The bill, which passed in an early morning vote, would grant immunity to a driver who “unintentionally” injures or kills a person if they are “fleeing from a riot” and are “under a reasonable belief that fleeing was necessary to protect the motor vehicle operator from serious injury or death.”
The bill defines a rioter as anyone carrying out “murder, maiming, robbery, rape or arson” during civil unrest"
Of course, click on The Bill, above, to read the actual bill.
Hmmmm…the actual bill says the driver must have exercised reasonable care during his fleeing.
Man…the media really has exaggerated this bill.
So just to be clear, you do believe there is a pedophile ring populated by top people in our govt, primarily Democrats?
Absolutely that is sadly very true. It’s nothing less than the war between GOOD and EVIL. Those who slander the Law will die by the Law… so they keep repeating on a treadmill, spiraling down, down, down, lower and lower, deep into the karmic beastly soup then poof!!
PurpnGold:I have a problem with these bills that allow drivers to hit protesters without punishment
Here’s a little more detail, though certainly not a quote from the bill.
“The bill would make it misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail and a $5,000 fine for anyone who blocks the use of a public street. The measure would also grant a motorist criminal and civil immunity if they kill or injure someone while fleeing from a riot.”
That would appear to say if you don’t want to be at risk from someone fleeing, don’t create a riot.
Just saw a little more. NOt only do they have to be fleeing from a riot but the death or injury caused must be unintentional. Some stories are leaving out significant portions of what the bill is about.
Is anyone surprised?
More:The bill, which passed in an early morning vote, would grant immunity to a driver who “unintentionally” injures or kills a person if they are “fleeing from a riot” and are “under a reasonable belief that fleeing was necessary to protect the motor vehicle operator from serious injury or death.”
The bill defines a rioter as anyone carrying out “murder, maiming, robbery, rape or arson” during civil unrest"Of course, click on The Bill, above, to read the actual bill.
Hmmmm…the actual bill says the driver must have exercised reasonable care during his fleeing.
Man…the media really has exaggerated this bill.
Shocking!
If someone tries to block a vehicle from advancing because of some riot ■■■■■■■■■■ folks should be allowed to leave. I wouldn’t sit still while my car gets surrounded, attacked, burned up, or anything similar. Try and stop me because of your riot, and I’ll simply leave. I don’t suggest anyone do that. Simple.
Samm: toreyj01: Samm:Is that what Q believes? How do you know that? Are you Q?
- Yes
- They said so
- No
Who said so? Is that in their charter?
It seems you don’t know a lot about Qanon, and I count that as a plus for you. Glad you haven’t fallen down this rabbit hole many of your fellow Conservatives have. I am hoping this is all a fad but it may just be a harbinger for the next fraudulent movement.
I don’t understand why some Cons are being targeted with these conspiracies and why they seem to take hold so well with them, Libs are prone to flights of fancy as well (9/11 truthers come to mind) but not to the extent that they invade the US Capital building to stop certification of a perfectly legitimate election, all on the basis of lies and nonsense.
There has to be something at play which makes these folks vulnerable to manipulation. Some say they are anxious about the changing demographics of the country and their perceived loss of power, I don’t know if that is true but it seems palpable.
He says while studiously ignoring over a year of leftist violence and destruction.
toreyj01: Samm: toreyj01: Samm:Is that what Q believes? How do you know that? Are you Q?
- Yes
- They said so
- No
Who said so? Is that in their charter?
It seems you don’t know a lot about Qanon, and I count that as a plus for you. Glad you haven’t fallen down this rabbit hole many of your fellow Conservatives have. I am hoping this is all a fad but it may just be a harbinger for the next fraudulent movement.
I don’t understand why some Cons are being targeted with these conspiracies and why they seem to take hold so well with them, Libs are prone to flights of fancy as well (9/11 truthers come to mind) but not to the extent that they invade the US Capital building to stop certification of a perfectly legitimate election, all on the basis of lies and nonsense.
There has to be something at play which makes these folks vulnerable to manipulation. Some say they are anxious about the changing demographics of the country and their perceived loss of power, I don’t know if that is true but it seems palpable.
He says while studiously ignoring over a year of leftist violence and destruction.
The violence is not justified but it’s part of something.
The Q following and the radicalization behind it is based in imagination.
Just look at the last post by a Q supporter in this thread