Who needs an AR-15?

[Bosun]

I will take two AR-15, one for each hand. …

Biden will take on ice cream cone

[fallenturtle]

@Bosun

I will take two AR-15, one for each hand. …

Biden will take on ice cream cone

People who like ice cream are the worst؟

[Bosun]

All I can say is

[Bosun]

This guy has a weird look in his eye.

[Rurudyne]

Another good ad would be: “Be advised, I shoot like my Grandma” with something like this picture from earlier…

[TheRedComet]

She knows Trigger discipline.

Alec Baldwin could have used some lessons from her.

[Rurudyne]

When I was in college a buddy had a pistol and a BB pistol. The guy he shared a dorm with was … testosterone deficient shall we say … and couldn’t tell the difference between them. Twice. My friend was lucky to have survived being careless enough to think he’d know after the first time.

[Rurudyne]

That’s kinda how people in an eating contest look.

[fallenturtle]

@Bosun

All I can say is

Look at that piece of ■■■■ ice cream eater!؟ Disgusting!؟

[fallenturtle]

@Bosun

This guy has a weird look in his eye.

Ugh؟
Nobody who likes ice cream should be allowed in the white house؟

[Scratch]

[Rurudyne]

Back in the day when Clinton was giving his SOTU the media was chomping at the bit to cut away from him to reveal the OJ verdict. The next day supposedly serious journalists lamented that we had to hear about OJ from Geraldo.

But backtracking to the speech itself, Clinton had been speaking for a while and you could see his eyes darting towards the pitcher of cool water and the cup. At a long applause line he deftly poured himself a glass and took a drink. Throat was probably dry, you know.

So while he drank the announcer on that station spoke up in one of those golf whispers used by people wanting to act like they’re right there and if they talked normally they’d ruin the shot or tee off. He said, IIRC: “President William Jefferson Clinton giving his state of the Union speech.”

… and I’m thinking, good, good keep the cookies on the low shelves … but then….

“Still unaware of the OJ Simpson verdict!”

And I shouted “He cares?!?” at the TV.

Please note, I’m no Clinton supporter, far far FAR from it.

Years later I’d hear that George V’s doctor had killed him, and he may have done so, chosen the timing, so that the proper papers and not the scandal sheets would run the story first … so the “serious journalists” being upset that Geraldo broke the OJ story is even more believable now.

[Rodeo]

@Bosun

This guy has a weird look in his eye.

The single biggest electoral mistake in American history.

[WuWei]

@Scratch

@WuWei

Well, that’s ridiculous.

As was that response that I was probably never truly tested…

If you don’t understand, it’s OK to ask.

[WuWei]

I would say brain freeze, but…

[Scratch]

@WuWei

If you don’t understand, it’s OK to ask.

We all know the only way to truly be tested is to serve in combat right?

[WuWei]

@Scratch

@WuWei

If you don’t understand, it’s OK to ask.

We all know the only true test is to serve in combat right?

In a way. Of course it doesn’t necessarily have to be actual “combat”. Although I would say that is probably the highest level.

Tell me:

@Scratch

Confident in myself…

On what foundation does this confidence lie?

[Samm]

@Rurudyne

If the BoR was incorporated on account of the privileges or immunities clause then Congress was not by it enumerated a Power to enact federal civil rights laws. Moreover, the due process clause of the 14th, which can be said to be in reference to the 4th to 8th Amendments (but not the 1st to 3rd, or 9th) which are laid out in the ordinary order of a legal proceeding from investigation to assessing fines or punishment has no function if incorporation of the whole BoR was performed by the privileges or immunities clause.

The States were already covered by A4:S2:C1 … there was no need for incorporation. Even the structure of the language used in the A4 clause vs that used in the 14th testifies against the modern perversion of the texts, for in capitalizing outside of the ordinary grammatical use in the P&I clause highlights that it is reference to a particular thing that preexisted it (nominally our Common Law P&I as known among all the several States that Ratified) but with the 14th these are not capitalized because no one could know what privileges or immunities the Congress MIGHT respect until they passed a statute to that effect.

The reason for enumerating a Power to Congress to enact civil rights statutes that State Actors cannot disparage (note: this does NOT include private persons or privately held entities) is because otherwise they could do nothing but wait for the unpredictable whims of people bringing suit and those subsequently going through the courts whenever their A4:S2:C1 Privileges and Immunities were trampled.

That’s an interesting thesis. But as far as the 2nd Amendment is concerned, it doesn’t matter. It is incorporated regardless of means or interpretations.

[Samm]

@WuWei

With the 1st, it very clearly says “Congress shall make no law…”

So incorporation is necessary IMO. Of course the 2nd and 3rd, make no such distinction.

And if there was any doubt, the Heller v. D.C. ruling eliminated it. The prohibition on government to infringe on the people’s right to keep and bear arms applies to the governments of all of the States and all of their political subdivisions.

[Samm]

@Scratch

@WuWei

Interesting. Probably never been truly tested then.

Oh I think watching my late wife pass away from cancer is being tested… among other things

Yeah, I must admit. Having an AR or any gun would not help you through that.

But that’s not really what Sneaky is referring to, is it.