Who knew that Sweden and Poland would be leading the fight for free speech?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Is it? I can find a gazillion Xs or whatever is 18 now to agree with me. You’re showing your age.

You do not figuratively lose your voice if you don’t have Twitter. I don’t care what an irrational teen thinks.

I can’t believe you are siding with a teenagers thoughts on social media

@WuWei

No. It is not suppressed, you have the same voice from Twitter with 5 or 1M.

I don’t have the same voice as AOC. She has a million followers. She has more reach. “It’s not fair”

@WuWei

And? Is that public access? I doubt it they can.

Of course not. This argument isn’t helping you. Walmart is a private company and they aren’t required to allow all speech.

@WuWei

Management (execution) and policy the same thing?

That was weak.

No policy sets the requirements and direction… management executes the policy.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@conan

I don’t recall you ever defended that bakery.

I’m arguing for consistency…try it sometimes.

What product is Twitter refusing to produce for potential users?

The access (service) to the platform. Service is a product.

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

That wasn’t the question that was asked.

She also spends a ton of time on Twitch.

Why both? Which one does the media quote her on?

Let’s cut her off Twitter and see if she squeals. I wouldn’t be surprised if she actually used “unperson” although it is a bit before her time. The dogma lives deep within her.

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

I haven’t spent a second arguing for them. You assumed I was. I have been arguing against them the whole time - but all of them.

You called public accommodation fascism.

And because that fascism exists then the further fascism of forcing private platforms to host content that they do not want to host folks out of that.

It literally makes no sense.

[conan]

They can do what they want…as long as they’re not getting a single penny from government whether it’s tax credits, subsidies or federal contracts.

And they have to pay for any and all right aways.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

You do not figuratively lose your voice if you don’t have Twitter. I don’t care what an irrational teen thinks.

I can’t believe you are siding with a teenagers thoughts on social media

18 year-old vote.

@PurpnGold

I don’t have the same voice as AOC. She has a million followers. She has more reach. “It’s not fair”

You have a million reads here, how many does she have? Choices.

@PurpnGold

Of course not. This argument isn’t helping you. Walmart is a private company and they aren’t required to allow all speech.

That is my argument.

@PurpnGold

No policy sets the requirements and direction… management executes the policy.

Whew! That’s a relief.

[conan]

Keep in mind, they’re using public right aways, airwaves elect to transfer their materials.

That’s the same argument libs used on that bakery.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

The access (service) to the platform. Service is a product

The service or access to Twitter is free. Anyone can sign up as long as they meet the criteria for entry.

If you don’t meet the criteria for entry, then you are denied entry.

There are apps that I can both sign up for, like clubhouse, because I don’t meet the right criteria. Should they be forced to allow me into their app, for free?

[Jezcoe]

@WuWei

@Jezcoe

That wasn’t the question that was asked.

She also spends a ton of time on Twitch.

Why both? Which one does the media quote her on?

Let’s cut her off Twitter and see if she squeals. I wouldn’t be surprised if she actually used “unperson” although it is a bit before her time. The dogma lives deep within her.

If Twitter wants to cut her off I won’t argue how it is fascism they did it.

Their playground their rules.

She will easily find an audience in other ways because she knows where her audience and how to reach them.

I mean… how the hell did any politician talk to anyone before like 2008?

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

You called public accommodation fascism.

It is and I did.

@Jezcoe

And because that fascism exists then the further fascism of forcing private platforms to host content that they do not want to host folks out of that.

Yes. All fascism must be fought at the root.

The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly.

Abraham Lincoln

I’m going after culture generators ala Gramsci

@Jezcoe

It literally makes no sense.

It’s what you © do.

[conan]

Are they using public right aways and airwaves…yes or no?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

The access (service) to the platform. Service is a product

The service or access to Twitter is free. Anyone can sign up as long as they meet the criteria for entry.

If you don’t meet the criteria for entry, then you are denied entry.

There are apps that I can both sign up for, like clubhouse, because I don’t meet the right criteria. Should they be forced to allow me into their app, for free?

Right, so open to the public. A public accommodation.

What’s the criteria for signing up?

[Jezcoe]

@conan

They can do what they want…as long as they’re not getting a single penny from government whether it’s tax credits, subsidies or federal contracts.

And they have to pay for any and all right aways.

Why would Twitter pay for a right of way?

What subsidies do they receive?

Tax credits?

[conan]

Are they not using public right aways…yes or no?

[PurpnGold]

@conan

Are they using public right aways and airwaves…yes or no?

Yes.

Walmart uses public freeways to deliver products to stores… therefore, they should not be allowed to restrict what speech they want in their stores? Is that your argument?

[Cratic3947]

Good meme from GAB

[WuWei]

@Jezcoe

@conan

They can do what they want…as long as they’re not getting a single penny from government whether it’s tax credits, subsidies or federal contracts.

And they have to pay for any and all right aways.

Why would Twitter pay for a right of way?

What subsidies do they receive?

Tax credits?

Why would I pay for a business license or a permit to bear arms?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Right, so open to the public. A public accommodation.

Yes, is Twitter violating public accommodation laws by banning Trump? If so what is the text they are violating?

[zantax]

@PurpnGold

@conan

Are they using public right aways and airwaves…yes or no?

Yes.

Walmart uses public freeways to deliver products to stores… therefore, they should not be allowed to restrict what speech they want in their stores? Is that your argument?

Do they advertise themselves to be public speech platforms?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@conan

Are they using public right aways and airwaves…yes or no?

Yes.

Walmart uses public freeways to deliver products to stores… therefore, they should not be allowed to restrict what speech they want in their stores? Is that your argument?

It’s been the left’s argument for many things, religion for example.