MarkyS
March 25, 2019, 5:39am
46
Glenn Greenwald is having a lot of fun at the expense of the media, today
.
.
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1110027367882346496
.
Kinda reminds me of all the video of the media predicting the 2016 election.Those compilations were a hoot, too.
How embarrasing this has been for the American media.
M
There is a media reckoning needed but that clip cobbled together is part of it, it’s the same as the footage pieced together.
I don’t need to be an expert I read the letter that charged him with his duties.
Reminds me of the breathless anticipation of the Bush/Cheney indictments.
John_Wick:
Snow96:
How many times did you hear the entire thing like I posted above?
You know, that others in the department reviewed muellers findings? That rosenstien apparently agreed with Barr?
That there wasn’t enough to say Trump committed a crime. Wow! Whoopee!
I’m fine with it, but Trump and his lamestreme supporters claiming complete exoneration are full of ■■■■■
It’s more like OJ getting off.
That’s quite the change from your previous comments on what Mueller had the authority to investigate.
2 Likes
Yeah, when I read that I went ■■■? Completely did a 180 on his position. When I see this I suspect that the arguments are just to be contradictory and not genuine.
1 Like
JayJay
March 25, 2019, 12:35pm
53
Rye:
JayJay:
I don’t watch talking heads.
I tell everyone I know to do their own fact checking and don’t just listen to anyone else.
So why would I waste time and energy on talking heads?
To paraphrase Red Dawn…all that hate’s gonna burn you up…and it’s NOT gonna keep you warm.
A few clarifications:
How do you deiced where you get you facts from are the best starting point
Where should one go to go do the best fact checking.
Why aren’t talking heads of different political persuasions as good as any other reference point as one fact check method.
In the end don’t all ‘‘fact checking’’ sources have a bias
Yes…all sources have a bias.
How do you think you would overcome that?
Who fact checks the President?
So now we are supposed to believe Mueller? I thought he was Democrat trying his hardest to undermine this President?
Democrats :
2016 : “It’s Mueller Time!” “Mueller is God”
2019 : “Mueller and Barr compromised,…we must investigate!”
That’s because Mueller did not find any crimes against their King.
Now Mueller is a patriot.
1 Like
Mueller wasn’t involved until 2017.
I am just glad all this liberal fantasies are coming to a close.
What’s next for President Trump? What agenda is he tackling next?
Anything you want him to focus on?
So now we know why deep state Rosenstein stayed.
The premise of the investigation was…
…which included whether or not there were connections or corroberation with the Trump campaign. The Trump campaign was not the ‘entire premise’ of the investigation.
1 Like
I tuned into MSNBC shortly after it was announced that the letter had been released. From the get-go they were saying that it said that it does not conclude that the President committed a crime. And they basically said it that way over the hour that I watched.
Tguns
March 25, 2019, 10:45pm
65
After more than two years of expecting this report was going to lay out the goods on the treasonous traitor in the white house, only to have that fever dream fall flat, it’s really no wonder they’re clinging to what ever string of hope that may remain for their tattered reputation.
I don’t watch either CNN or Fox but I suspect if you do you’ll get the first part of the quote from the latter. So just match them up.