Who is Eric Ciaramella

So you think Trump supporters are upset. I am not upset by a process…just like Mueller…that cannot offer a cogent infraction and then has to proceed in a secret bunker only leaking smears and innuendo.

I am disappointed that the D party is performing so poorly. I am happy at President trumps prospects for a second term. The D are approaching this with a sloppy and suspicious process even after the party line vote…which also hurts them.

:ballot_box_with_check:

No worries… in a week or so the public portion of the inquiry begins and we will see the transcripts of the closed door testimony.

You will get your wish.

Nothing strikes me as funnier in the past few weeks than the complaints of the “secret bunker” — so secret in fact that almost half the people who attended sessions in that bunker were Republicans… so secret that a fool like Matt Gaetz could lead a passel of thugs into it with no difficulties and then have pizza delivered.

Certainly the first secret bunker in the world that the pizza delivery guy could find!

But given that no Trump supporter here is willing to discuss the evidence, we are left with tales of secret bunkers, coups, cabals and cloud strikes.

The most heartening thing about being part of the resistance to Trump is that the resistance doesn’t have to console ourselves with fantasies like “secret bunkers.”

How is pointing out the hypocrisy of the Democrats defending Trump? And what kinda stuff have I sworn he wasn’t doing? I think you must be projecting.

If you are right, so am I. Your opinion is just that, an opinion.

Trump being reelected over Sniffer and Pocahontas is a benefit to the country.

1 Like

Apparently the ones that Ukraine got all of.

ONLY because congress passed an extension in the continuing resolution… This is all very, very easy to document…

So…the dire result of all this supposed threat is that Congress had to pass an extension? Not exactly what I would call a catastrophe worthy of impeachment.

It’s a violation of the Impoundment Control Act… You know, a federal law… Can the next democrat president who opposes some program just withhold the funds?

DACA proved they can just write their own law.

2 Likes

Well let’s see. Had Russia ceded Crimea back to Ukraine?

Had Russia pulled it’s forces out of Ukraine?

Well let’s see. If we go with the democrat’s version it isn’t a violation of the law until the SCOTUS rules on it.

We can also go with doing it by EO which now thanks to the courts have the power of law.

Those aren’t the only possible outcomes. What effects have the sanctions had on Russia and still do to this day

Unfortunately for Trump supporters, the SCOTUS doesn’t get a say in impeachment…

That’s not true.

Except of course, it is true… SCOTUS has no input on impeachment…

No, it is not true. The SCOTUS will be the Final Arbiters in any Constitutional questions and the Chief Justice will preside over the Senate portion, which is part of impeachment.

You are quite simply wrong.

1 Like

And when does that take place? Before or after impeachment?

During.