Still clinging to Dilbert was racist?
Yes…your denial.
You still believe you know Dilbert intent.
I wrote that, but it’s not about “that kid.”
My quote is about exactly what it says, nothing more. I literally said that the sign wasn’t racist in that thread, and I already quoted it for you.
My god, man. I literally just said that it was a racist statement but that didn’t mean he is a racist person. Are you reading the posts you’re responding to?
Now please delete the dishonest use of the Twitter quote I didn’t write from your previous post.
So you’re saying when language is always revolving you weren’t taking about OK sign?
So you did not say this about Dilbert?
1 Like
No, I certainly wasn’t. You can read the thread for yourself and see that it was in response to a comment about language evolution in general. And again, I literally said that the use of the symbol was inadvertent and not racist.
Okay, I can see your point here. That does imply that the Dilbert guy is racist, and for that, Conan, I sincerely apologize. I shouldn’t have written that because I don’t believe he’s racist based on one dumb comment, and any Biden voter who says otherwise is being dishonest.
1 Like
Thank you…upon farther reading I see you were referring that language is always evolving in general and not just OK sign.
So in that case I will apologize.
1 Like
I agree, especially with your last point, however, we do have codified hate crime laws and this is where the rub is. Those pesky liberals are pointing to what the law says and the conservatives don’t care what the law states because logically, the act of beating someone to death involves hate.
To say someone pointing to the law and following the law endorses the act of murder though is a logical jump I do not comprehend and those making it would have to give their reasoning behind it.
being tried as adults after their cases were automatically sent to the adult court system last week.
Excellent. 
2 Likes