349

I am assuming you are going to accuse CISA of being full of anti-Trump Deep Staters and make a blanket dismissal of their assertions rather than actually try and refute their assertions.

I suppose the international watchdog invited to the US by Trump’s State Department and which came to the exact same conclusion likewise is full of anti-Trumpers?

How easy it is for you to dismiss any evidence contrary to your Incepted beliefs by simply declaring the people who provides it as “anti-Trump”.

How convenient for you

350

The failure is actually yours. You provide no indication in the post that you were quoting a paragraph from the article.

So a couple of suggestions as a standard way to indicate that you are guote materials.

#1 Use quote punctuation like we were taught in elementary schools such as: “You see…there’s a problem. You’re quoting the article I posted and believing that I wrote “Detroit Free Press”. Get a grip, be accurate, read carefully…and then get back to me…k?”

image
image933×219 14 KB

#2. Highlight the text in your post, then click the blockquote icon in the toolbar to wrap the text. lt then appears like this:

You see…there’s a problem. You’re quoting the article I posted and believing that I wrote “Detroit Free Press”. Get a grip, be accurate, read carefully…and then get back to me…k?

Just say’n.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

3 Likes
351

No the error was yours…a communication error.

Not an understanding error on his part.

352

Well true. I figured everyone could read the link and provided it for that purpose. Shame on me for expecting my fellow forumites to be a tad more thorough but I’ll take your constructive criticism going forward to minimize this misunderstanding. Thank you.

353

Just say’n forum users shouldn’t have to investigate a post to be able to take it at face value.

You are welcome, just trying to help.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

354

You are missing the point. The election results were never changed, just the reporting of the results. The actual results remained the same.

It’s like CNN getting a story wrong but the facts never changed.

355

Error that NEVER effected the vote count for either candidate.

356

It doesn’t get more petulant than that.

1 Like
357

But at least there’s one person here who admits it.

Everyone else wants to play a game.

1 Like
358

True enough LOL

359

Smyrna, you aren’t quoting the Detroit Free Press. You are quoting a website that bills itself as covering “shipping and logistics news” telling you that they are quoting the Detroit Free Press, but then doesn’t actually quote them.

image
Whyyyyyyy? Why are you even at a website described as being about freight news for this topic? How does that even happen?

5 Likes
360

Only because we became aware of it. How many more happened that you aren’t aware of? That’s the question that must be answered if there is going to be a peaceful outcome.

361

No votes were changed, None.

362

Keep eating and regurgibleeting things you couldn’t possibly know to be true. I’m not wired that way. Something as important as this, must be scrutinized for honesty and integrity.

1 Like
363

None because it was never a tabulation error.

If you had the slightest understanding as to how elections are run, you would know this error would never have gotten to the final count.

But you don’t want to know,

Because Inception.

1 Like
364

Wrong. You can know.

I’ve worked elections so I know all the safeguards in place to prevent such things.

It’s not that one can’t know.

It’s that YOU don’t want to know because Inception.

365

I do know it and you have been spoon fed the information that proves it, yet you choose to regurgibleet the Trump narrative.

2 Likes
366

You didn’t even know Dominion software had nothing to do with the Antrim error, so I think we can put to rest the idea you have some superior drive to fully research things.

2 Likes
367

The votes weren’t miscounted. They were misreported.

368

It has been. Countless officials testify to the security of this election.