You’re the one that speculated without evidence that illegals might be accountable for 10x the number of rapes and domestic violence crimes they supposedly have been definitively been shown to be accountable for.
1 Like
We’re talking about putting mugshot posters on the lawn of the white house. Stay focused.
You did not
and clearly I did not accuse you of that.
(You have now switched from a straw man to a red herring.
FACT:
- Recidivism among criminals is ~49%
- If Trump deports 1,000 rapists he singly-handedly prevents 490 rapes.
FALSEHOOD 1:
- “You just said all immigrants are criminals.”
FALSEHOOD 2"
- “You just claimed I I don’t wat to deport criminals.”
Do you guys even know the difference anymore?
1 Like
No I did not.
I didn’t not make that speculation.
I made no speculation like that.
I made no speculation even a little bit like that.
You know this.
You have no rational argument, so you accuse your opponent of racism.
Lose an argument accuse your opponent of racism.
Standard Lib playbook . . . and off the top of my head I can think of no Con equivalent
1 Like
It’s right here in what you wrote.
Ah my bad, that’s right.
You were making up all the numbers completely and hoping for “some study” to “validate” them.
“this guy”??
means “I think 100% of all immigrants are criminals?”
Wow. It’s a little early in the morning to be higher than a kite.
And none of it addressed the fact that the data they use for these criminals statistics spans 40 years.
1 Like
Yes
The Dems left criminals here. <— That is not saying “I think 100% of all immigrants are criminals"
Criminal recidivism is high <— That is not saying “I think 100% of all immigrants are criminals"
Trumps actions reduce rape <— That is not saying “I think 100% of all immigrants are criminals"
1 Like
which is more limited in view than putting every sob case in the news. which you want
i am focused. just want you to see your stark hypocrisy
Note 
This is also not saying "I think 100% of all foreigners are criminals. 
Looks like about 50 posters there, tops.
How many illegals is Trump supposed to have apprehended in his first 100 days in office?
Well in his first month, about 38,000 have been deported, so let’s use that number and multiply by 3.
That’s 114,000.
50 would be 0.04% of that number.
Whew! Thank God Trump is “prioritizing” the “most dangerous” for removal.
A whole 0.04%.
I feel safer already.
2 Likes
You should probably cut back on smoking in the morning because that isn’t what I said.
You injected the 100% nonsense. Not me.
I posted a number, 14,000 and some.
I got accused of “immigrants as mostly criminals.”
Same old tire lib playbook.
- Get trounced by fact,
- Accuse your opponent of racism
(Off the top of my head there is no conservative equivalent. Only libs seem to be so dumb and so deperate they rely on this type of tactic.)
3 Likes
Yes we are well aware of the accuracy with which Trump’s DHS has been reporting statistics.
Especially when it comes to their reporting on the number of “gang members” they’ve supposedly detained/removed.
I believe the statistics of the people they’ve put mug shots up for on the White House lawn rather than their own reports for which they never provide any evidence of “trust us, bro!”
well. . . the above is based on first 50 days.
According to the above 14,111 i nearly half so 28,222 in the first 50 days
Twice that for for the first 100 maybe?
Already responded to that in a different post.
Let’s just say DHS has been shown to be less than trustworthy in their reporting…about as trustworthy as DOGE.
2 Likes
dont support people who willingly let them in here to begin with
and when you do because you will, dont bitch when theyre hard to get deported
and when you do that too because you will, maybe not criticize and oppose the measures being used so you can ultimately “feel safer”
4 Likes
You just did what you accused others of doing. Putting up a strawman argument that no lib is saying
1 Like
