What the law doesnât understand is that there is more than one version of the truth. You see, juries are told to believe that someone who doesnât say things that reflect the reality that was presented are liars and commuting perjury when really theyâre just saying the truth as they see it.
Itâs the height of arrogance for juries to think that they can know what the truth is and judge people for not adhering to it!
Perjury trap isnât made up fiction. Iâve known about it for years and didnât need Fox or anyone else to tell me what it is. Trump-haters pretending there is no such thing, are just doing what they always do when it comes to Trump.
In the context of who won the election, Trumpâs tax returns and the popular vote are not relevant. In terms of the question you posed as to whether or not Trump has anything to hide, his refusal to release his tax returns is certainly relevant as are a many other things I donât need to list here.
But I know this is all just me throwing monkey â â â â at the wall so you can then tell me Iâm frothing and talking pointing and make a thumbs up emoji, so have fun with that.
Oh, no, of course there is such a thing as a perjury trap.
But in order for it to work the prosecutor must know the subject has lied int eh past, or plans to lie in the future.
So proclaiming proudly to the world that Trump will not testify for fear of a perjury trap is admitting Trump either lied under oath in the past, or plans to in the future.
I laid this all out in a series of posts some time back. At the time I had a lengthy back and forth with a small handful of forum members. I have no intention of doing that again. You can go back and find the exchange or you can move on.