I did. The article spends a few sentences stating factual dat about the WH cooperating with Mueller. Nothing new there, other than Mcgahn sitting down with Mueller for 30 or so hours in multiple sessions.
The rest of the article provides rehashed background material and applies a bunch of biased spin. Not surprisingly Trump-haters are equating that spin with the small sliver of factual information that was provided.
So it is safe to assume you believe Trump should sit for an interview with Mueller then, seeing as he has nothing to hide and wants to fully cooperate with Mueller?
I’ve already had this conversation with you. The risk of Trump being ensnared in a perjury trap are too great. And please don’t insult me again by lecturing me about how there is no such thing as a perjury trap.
Sorry the mandate was pretty clear. Both Senate and house went Republican. This on too of many state governments going Republican. Of course the final blow is Trump winning. If Obama was as successful as some liberals think he was, not many voters thought the same.
No, they are not. Because he is still president the call for his records to be release is still valid. If he had lost then yes, the point would be moot.