Which purported incident do you find more plausible, that against Kavenaugh or Biden?

[Axxowiz]

Kavanaugh there was massive amounts of people protesting against “Believe all Women”. Media firmly behind wall to wall coverage. The accuser Ford made the cover of Time magazine over an accusation that had zero collaboration, Kavanaugh was 17 at the time and it wasn’t rape but sexually assaulted,

Biden on the other hand has a record for being creepy for a long time Democrat’s use to call him out on it way before he ran for president. Media has treated the story as if it didn’t exist up until recently, no protests from the metoo movement; actually they are being pretty quiet about It. Believe all women doesn’t apply anymore which is a good thing that has come from the Reade story (Convenient Timing). And the major difference Tara Reade has people backing up her story, two more came out yesterday. Ford never had that.

Kavanaugh Democrats reaction.

Biden Democrats reaction

[JayJay]

@anon91495210

You folks and your “Peer reviewed” studies. Didn’t college teach you critical thinking? I don’t need a peer review if I have a good point. I can show you a bunch of peer review articles that ended up being completely false. How about the global cooling from the 70’s. That was peer reviewed. How about climate models that were peer reviewed, yet every single one of them have come up short on accuracy? I can go to Church and write an article about Christianity and have my peers review it. Does that make it correct?

Youtube is full of him being creepy. I don’t need a damn peer reviewed article showing a history of creepy behavior. If he’s willing to do that crap in public, what the hell do you think he’s willing to do when no one’s watching?

The reason I asked is creepy behavior does not always lead one into committing sexual assault.

It really doesn’t.

That is critical thinking…not automatically making assumptions.

You didn’t think critically…you made an assumption that Biden’s public behavior is evidence he would commit sexual assault.

You have no facts on which to base this assumption…you have assumption and “intuition”.

Which is not “critical thinking”.

[WuWei]

@JayJay

The reason I asked is creepy behavior does not always lead one into committing sexual assault.

Is Biden fondling that child’s chest creepy or sexual assault?

[anon91495210]

What a bunch of garbage.
#1. You’re ASSUMING I’m saying Biden is guilty. I never said that. I simply said that between the two, Reade is the more believable.
#2. You accuse me of lacking facts: Kavanaugh had zero prior accusations or behavior that would indicate he MIGHT be capable of something like that. Ford had no corroboration. She had multiple changes in her story, didn’t know what YEAR it happened, had no idea how she got home…
#3. The FACT that Biden has prior creepy behavior is circumstantial evidence but it shows a clear history of unwelcome behavior. Wouldn’t be a stretch to imagine it going further than what was recorded in public. To suggest otherwise is the exact opposite of critical thinking. Yes, it may be true that his behavior might not translate into assault but it damn sure shouldn’t be ignored. In almost every case of assault, there are indicator behaviors that looking back, would indicate an issue. His behavior is certainly in that category.

Makes me wonder if you know what critical thinking actually is.

[anon91495210]

Both.

[Eagle-Keeper]

@JayJay

Show me that Biden’s “creepy history” is in any ways correlative with propensity for sexual assault.

Can you show any credible and substantiated allegation against Bret Kavenaugh that demonstrates he had a propensity to sexually assault women? Regarding Biden if a woman were to file a legal sexual harassment claim and it went to court, you can guarantee a prosecutor would absolutely use those videos in court. It’s not considered proof but it absolutely could be used as circumstantial evidence.