Fascinating.

I’ve been here for 15 years speaking out. I wasn’t just recently libs are advocating for it.

But remember, eliminate most of police you also eliminate most of judges and staff etc.

We could save tens of billions of dollars a year.

But I think there is another motive. When people provide for their own defense libs want to go after THEM.

Not going to dispute that…

Bull ■■■■■ It was the de facto Baltimore approach in Baltimore after the freddie gray riots. Murder rate went up in black communities.

Still choking people to death in the street. Still harassing people.

Any of the large American cities that have been managed by Democrats for decades. The liberal-socialists have been in charge, they’ve hired and fired police chiefs, their “advisors” write the policies for training and community relations. Why haven’t these elected powerful Democrats done something about their police departments years ago?

Don’t you have to eliminate some laws before you eliminate law enforcement?

30 years? How’s the economic progress of those in power been over that time?

Yes…been advocating that too.

Libs love making laws…and now they’re complain about carrying out those laws they created.

Who makes laws, maybe we should eliminate some of them?

Legislation. Ha…wish we could get rid of them. And I’m not just talking about democrats either. :wink:

1 Like

What was done and what were the results?

1 Like

We should keep the important ones.

Quaker meeting has begun.
No more laughing, no more fun.
Not allowed to show your tongue,
No more talking, no more fun.
No more chewing chewing gum.

starting now…

Guaranteed… some would call those rules systemic racism.

Is that how the song goes? “Still not loving police.”

I don’t any such song.

Yes sometimes civil unrest begets policy.

Arson, murder and looting usually begets more authoritarianism.

2 Likes