My position here been known for over a decade.
Libs are not liberal by any means. They are social authoritarians disguising themselves as liberal.
Oh. Thanks for the clarification. I guess I pay as close attention to your positions as you do mine.
Why do you use the abbreviated word for one group to identify another group? Why not just call the “Libs” “social authoritarians”?
Also, you still haven’t answered the question of what should happen to non-violent “Libs”?
Because I’ve made my position known here years ago.
And BTW…I’m not only one either.
Few others here that also makes the same disquisition.
Their is no such thing as non-violent libs.
Yeah? Who?
Anyone that has been listening.
Or do you mean other posters?
Who exactly is a “lib”? Can you identify a specific person who is a “lib”?
Other posters. This is the first that I’ve seen someone post that “Lib” and “Liberal” aren’t the same thing.
Cool. Now I know to address you as a lib, too.
Sounds like something that was just thought up to save face.
1 Like
Anyone that wants goverment to enforce their views onto society.
Libs are social conservatives?
Maybe if you can find where I ever wanted goverment to impose my views onto society then maybe you have a case.
Can you point me to a specific person? I just need one example.
Yes. If they are pushing for goverment to impose their views onto society they are authoritarians.
I don’t do call outs.
Have you ever seen me do one?
And down the rabbit hole we go.
Anyone who was/is against marriage equality is a lib?
