Nahh.
If you want to continue talking about the recount, you will need to find someone else. I’ve long since moved on.
Nahh.
If you want to continue talking about the recount, you will need to find someone else. I’ve long since moved on.
There are always people who believe they are the smartest people in the room when they are not.
How arrogant does one have to be to believe that they think they can set the rules for what is to be discussed?
ok. as long as you realize you were wrong.
it’s ok to admit. maybe you’d get that respect you were expecting.
There is always people who believe they are the smartest people in the room when they are not.
Another one who is looking to pile on. This really isn’t about one’s intelligence. It is more about following a discussion and responding to that discussion.
There are always people who believe they are the smartest people in the room when they are not.
they will dare not let it be obvious that democrats were cheating.
ok. as long as you realize you were wrong.
it’s ok to admit. maybe you’d get that respect you were expecting.
I’m not looking for respect. I’m simply looking for a discussion. Thus far 2 forum members have engaged in that discussion. You have chosen, for whatever reason, to continue talking about the recount. The recount has been beat to death, and a general consensus has already been reached. That was several days ago.
Oldandtired:There are always people who believe they are the smartest people in the room when they are not.
they will dare not let it be obvious that democrats were cheating.
Already seems obvious to many of us.
They don’t win much without cheating imo.
they will dare not let it be obvious that democrats were cheating.
That has already been established. Why are you continuing to harp on it? It has nothing to do with what is currently being discussed.
No, it is the refusal to allow others to have their opinions and continuing to push your opinion as the only right opinion that shows just what you believe you are. It has been a hoot to watch.
All this after your big arrival back stating how you no longer care about politics. Hilarious.
How many posts between yourself and JayJay “discussing” the recount and the pa supreme court decision would you like for me to post?
They don’t win much without cheating imo.
Yep! The only way DEMs can win is to steal elections.
Already seems obvious to many of us.
They don’t win much without cheating imo.
after openly cheating, makes one wonder what else goes on esp in close races
How many posts between yourself and JayJay “discussing” the recount and the pa supreme court decision would you like for me to post?
Please knock yourself out. You might also want to include recent posts between me and
@Samm.
after openly cheating, makes one wonder what else goes on esp in close races
Boo; hiss; Them rascally Democrats.
No, it is the refusal to allow others to have their opinions and continuing to push your opinion as the only right opinion that shows just what you believe you are.
We can’t even agree on which discussion we are talking about.
What’s interesting is that the focus is on the unused date-field. The on-going court battle is whether or not rejection of a ballot based on an unused field is constitutional. The courts can rule on the legislation as it stands, but they aren’t allowed fill in the missing blanks as to how invalid ballots are to be handled. That would be legislating from the bench. From what I see, individual counties seem to make it up as they go along. It seems the legislature should be able to clear up the c…
I take it this one wasn’t about the recount?
Or this one??
They were counting ballots the Supreme Court of PA told them not to count, a ruling they made on a technicality, not the election law. No ruling on the merits of law has been made yet, save by a lower state court, which SCOTPA ruled against on a jurisdiction question. This is where we stand now.
All this after your big arrival back stating how you no longer care about politics.
I was referring to my not obsessing about politics in my private life. I no longer lose sleep over it.
In the forum, I always welcome a good lively discussion. If only we could agree on what it is we are discussing.
How about this one? Not about the recount as well?
No, it didn’t. The earlier court decision stayed a lower court decision declaring the date requirement unconstitutional. The SC stayed the decision on a technicality. The ruling you cite simply made it clear that the earlier ruling must be followed.