Where are the arrests for showing up at Justices homes?

[Scratch]

@TexasCNC

There are plenty of people that didn’t know going into the capitol building was wrong.

Im sure you believe that…All the barricades they saw were a welcome sign to come on in and browse.

[JayJay]

@Smyrna

@JayJay

I missed the part where she said those who didn’t break into the Capitol,

That’s cuz she didn’t separate the two…and is EXACTLY the person you described.

She did.

She actually wasn’t referring to the CROWD in DC at all…but to a specific group of people.

[Smyrna]

@JayJay

She actually wasn’t referring to the CROWD in DC at all…but to a specific group of people.

“the lackeys”…or would that be “lackies”?

[DMK]

@zantax

That would surprise me because I used to live across the street from a federal judge and there was a blur over his property on google earth and his property tax records were also not in the system and that was over five years ago.

Lots of folks can be exempt in Florida. Just some of the list below:

Florida Statute §119.071 requires that all state, county and municipal records, which are not exempt by law, be open for inspection and copying by any person. It is the duty of the Property Appraiser to provide public access to non-exempt records we maintain in the most efficient way possible, preferably by remote electronic access via our website.

Justices of the Supreme Court, district court of appeal judges, circuit court judges, and county court judges; §119.071(4)(d)2.e., Fla. Stat.
(current or former are eligible)

State attorneys, assistant state attorneys, statewide prosecutors, or assistant statewide prosecutors; §119.071(4)(d)2.f., Fla. Stat.
(current or former are eligible)

General magistrates, special magistrates, judges of compensation claims, administrative law judges of the Division of Administrative Hearings, and child support enforcement hearing officers; §119.071(4)(d)2.g., Fla. Stat.
(only current are eligible)

[TexasCNC]

There are plenty of videos showing what I said is true.

[JayJay]

@Smyrna

@JayJay

She actually wasn’t referring to the CROWD in DC at all…but to a specific group of people.

“the lackeys”…or would that be “lackies”?

You think the lackeys reference was about the crowd?

You need to learn the definition of lackey, then.

[WuWei]

@TexasCNC

Maybe I should be more clear… Democrats. That party has been full of disgusting policies since the 1800’s.

I disagree. Democrats used to be reasonable. Had some good policies.

Their biggest problem is they don’t know when enough is enough.

[WuWei]

@TexasCNC

I don’t agree. The Constitution protects your right to keep and bear arms. Carry in public? Constitutional. Carry on government property (our property). Constitutional. Carry on private property? My choice. I actually get upset if you DON’T carry on my private property but I also side with private property rights. If you don’t want me there with a firearm, I’m good with that. I just won’t come.

You said you don’t agree, then agreed.

[Roxiebelle]

It’s flat out against the law and yet not a single person has been detained or protestors dispersed. It’s pretty disgusting and exposes Democrat pols not willing to enforce laws on the books if breaking those laws benefit their political agenda.

It’s Democrat Party “ends justify the means” lawlessness & corruption…the Obama legacy!

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading
U.S. Code

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@WuWei

@TexasCNC

Maybe I should be more clear… Democrats. That party has been full of disgusting policies since the 1800’s.

I disagree. Democrats used to be reasonable. Had some good policies.

Their biggest problem is they don’t know when enough is enough.

Generally speaking, we were proceeding under Roe/Casey. Seems to me Alito, et al pushed the boundary, not the Dems.

[WuWei]

Proceeding towards what?

[Mountain_Soldier]

@WuWei

Proceeding towards what?

Abortion on demand at any time?

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@WuWei

Proceeding towards what?

Proceeding. Continuing. Carrying on.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@Mountain_Soldier

@WuWei

Proceeding towards what?

Abortion on demand at any time?

A myth.

[WuWei]

There are those…

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Mountain_Soldier

@WuWei

Proceeding towards what?

Abortion on demand at any time?

A myth.

What is the objective rationale for limiting it?

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@WuWei

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Mountain_Soldier

@WuWei

Proceeding towards what?

Abortion on demand at any time?

A myth.

What is the objective rationale for limiting it?

That is not the point. Abortion went on under Roe and Casey. We accepted it and proceeded.

[Mountain_Soldier]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@Mountain_Soldier

@WuWei

Proceeding towards what?

Abortion on demand at any time?

A myth.

Isn’t that what that pink shoes-wearing woman Who filibustered in Texas wanted with her protest?

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

That is not the point.

It is now

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

We accepted it and proceeded.

Obviously not. Who is this “we” I keep hearing about?