Good luck, they ignore any notion of prior restraint. Or I should say, support prior restraint. As long as it’s directed at their political enemies. Pretty sure they wouldn’t like it applied to them.
1 Like
No prior restraint because someone might do something. We all agree the second doesn’t protect you if you murder someone.
3 Likes
Those are all based on the harm done to others, not in the speech itself. The First Amendment protects all speech, but it does not absolve you of the responsibility for the effects that what you say has on others.
The exact same concept goes for keeping and bearing arms.
2 Likes
