People do not value the rights of others. The gun banners typically do not own guns. So they have no problem seizing them from people who do.

1 Like

Yes, it is banning it. To do so is:

  1. UnConstitutional
  2. Racist
  3. Inequitable
  4. Prior restraint

How about we register your votes? Words?

The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting.

You don’t get to diminish my rights because you’re scared.

2 Likes

How convenient.

:rofl: I understand. It’s uncomfortable.

Most of their nonsensical ideas would never stand at the SC level.

That pesky 2nd amendment infuriates the radical left. :grin:

1 Like

I saw it for home invasions. Is a burglary not someone invading your home?

Incorrect. The percentage of households with guns in them has gone down not up.

1 Like

Hey, I’m fine to work on both. You up for it?

1 Like

It’s not about hunting.

1 Like

That’s what we said in 1994.

Conceding yet another of my rights because you’re scared? No.

2 Likes

Did I say “We’ve never had this many households with guns”?

Since when should a lib have any say in how many bullets are in a clip?

1 Like

I’m not sure what you are talking about.

What is your proposed solution for teen suicides?

Well. Until guns can stand up and shoot themselves the number of guns is irrelevant. The number of people who have them is.

And that number has been going down.

You know full well the difference between a typical burglary and a home invasion.

1 Like

You didn’t know. Don’t try to play it off.

1 Like

They shouldn’t. Most of their idiot lawmakers don’t even know what one is. Hat tip to the idiot that thinks once you shoot the bullets out of one it’s done.

2 Likes

Between 2003 and 2007— • A household member was home in 28% of the 3.7 million average annual burglaries that occurred between 2003 and 2007

What is 28% of 3.7M?