She had a history of corruption in high office, knowledge of the ins and outs of D.C. corruption, the lots of people to protect her, including those in the press.
As I pointed out before the election if Trump were to decide to be corrupt as Hillary he’d have to learn the specific ropes of a new venue, he’d have to also do so while the Leftist media would be watching him like a hawk, never mind looking for any pretext to accuse him they may find as they’ve done.
In short: the alternative was already past the point of deciding to be corrupt while in high office, while Trump had yet to cross that Rubicon; she had the specific infrastructure and support he lacked; and she would be protected.
Trump and Hillary were it for me. I didn’t vote for either one of them, and I certainly won’t vote for anyone as bad or (banish the thought) anyone even worse. I’ll just vote 3rd party or refrain from entering anyone on the ballot for “president.”
Yeah, honestly - I think having the same party in control of the executive and both branches of Congress is a bad thing. I think at least one of the above needs to be controlled by an opposition party just to keep everyone honest.
Sure. I see the House and Senate fast-tracking strange, unconstitutional laws that read simply “Lock Up Hillary Clinton Forever,” just so that they could land at her desk for her to veto.
And then they’d have the tyranny of a dictator to talk about forevermore.
