What will "war" in Iran look like? Your prediction?

Jezcoe · 2020-01-10T00:33:10.265Z

altair1013:

Jezcoe:

Iran doesn’t really have the ability to attack the US now.

Then there’s no problem at all. The president isn’t going to hit them unless they hit us. No war.

Does that include proxies?

altair1013 · 2020-01-10T00:35:56.010Z

TheRedComet:

They would eventually recover. So we would have to do it again.

Maybe, maybe not. Do you want some kind of guarantee that everything will be perfect?

thinkingman · 2020-01-10T00:40:44.875Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

altair1013:

Jezcoe:

Show that there was no deal in place that was limiting Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

There was a deal. That doesn’t mean they were following it. They were working to develop a nuke. No doubt about it.

that is obvious to us.

but common sense doesnt apply in leftyland

Any proof that they were not following the agreement?

their admission that they will not follow the agreement count?

thinkingman · 2020-01-10T00:42:32.999Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

the repeated declared intentions of vowing to wipe israel off the map over the years

You do not need nuclear weapons for that.

lol. no i guess not

why ever pursue them while fanatically vowing to do so though huh?

this is the kind of childish thinking and policy that emboldens these screwballs.

and we go and send them hip high stacks of cash in response

They stopped pursuing them in 2015 under an international agreement for sanctions relief.

The transfer of money and assets was part of abiding by an old agreement.

Now that the US has backed out the deal for no reason, since by accounts of the IAEA Iran abided by the agreed deal, there is no real reason for them to follow the agreement anymore. Now that they don’t need to follow the agreement anymore and have shown indications of manufacturing weapons grade material… something that the IAEA said had stopped happening… what happens next?

did we have possession of that cash which we then sent them? yes or no?

Jezcoe · 2020-01-10T00:43:36.887Z

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

altair1013:

Jezcoe:

Show that there was no deal in place that was limiting Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

There was a deal. That doesn’t mean they were following it. They were working to develop a nuke. No doubt about it.

that is obvious to us.

but common sense doesnt apply in leftyland

Any proof that they were not following the agreement?

their admission that they will not follow the agreement count?

Show me.

TheRedComet · 2020-01-10T00:44:34.079Z

No. War is never certain. There are no guarantees.

We just need to be certain that the strikes are worth the possible consequences. Both humanitarian and political.

If it’s worth it, go for it. Destroy their Air Force, the missile sites, etc.

Let’s just make sure it’s worth it.

thinkingman · 2020-01-10T00:45:25.445Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

altair1013:

Jezcoe:

Show that there was no deal in place that was limiting Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

There was a deal. That doesn’t mean they were following it. They were working to develop a nuke. No doubt about it.

that is obvious to us.

but common sense doesnt apply in leftyland

Any proof that they were not following the agreement?

their admission that they will not follow the agreement count?

Show me.

seriously?

CNBC – 5 Jan 20

Iran will no longer abide by uranium enrichment limits under 2015 nuclear deal

Iran would have no limit on its enrichment capacity, the level to which uranium could be enriched, or its nuclear research and development.

Jezcoe · 2020-01-10T00:47:27.932Z

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

the repeated declared intentions of vowing to wipe israel off the map over the years

You do not need nuclear weapons for that.

lol. no i guess not

why ever pursue them while fanatically vowing to do so though huh?

this is the kind of childish thinking and policy that emboldens these screwballs.

and we go and send them hip high stacks of cash in response

They stopped pursuing them in 2015 under an international agreement for sanctions relief.

The transfer of money and assets was part of abiding by an old agreement.

Now that the US has backed out the deal for no reason, since by accounts of the IAEA Iran abided by the agreed deal, there is no real reason for them to follow the agreement anymore. Now that they don’t need to follow the agreement anymore and have shown indications of manufacturing weapons grade material… something that the IAEA said had stopped happening… what happens next?

did we have possession of that cash which we then sent them? yes or no?

Only the $1.7 Billion of their money from the 70’s … with interest.

Jezcoe · 2020-01-10T00:49:47.463Z

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

altair1013:

Jezcoe:

Show that there was no deal in place that was limiting Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

There was a deal. That doesn’t mean they were following it. They were working to develop a nuke. No doubt about it.

that is obvious to us.

but common sense doesnt apply in leftyland

Any proof that they were not following the agreement?

their admission that they will not follow the agreement count?

Show me.

seriously?

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/05/iran-will-no-longer-abide-by-any-limits-on-uranium-enrichment-under-2015-nuclear-deal-state-tv.html

That was after the US pulled out of the deal

Roxiebelle · 2020-01-10T00:54:42.109Z

“level” as in the military facilities, if the military is damaged beyond repair the people of Iran have a chance to get their freedom back that they lost over 40 years ago. Where on that list is any civilian targets anyway?

Seriously get a grip!

Jezcoe · 2020-01-10T01:06:17.169Z

Roxiebelle:

“level” as in the military facilities, if the military is damaged beyond repair the people of Iran have a chance to get their freedom back that they lost over 40 years ago. Where on that list is any civilian targets anyway?

Seriously get a grip!

Why would bombing their country send them into civil war?

thinkingman · 2020-01-10T01:08:47.728Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

the repeated declared intentions of vowing to wipe israel off the map over the years

You do not need nuclear weapons for that.

lol. no i guess not

why ever pursue them while fanatically vowing to do so though huh?

this is the kind of childish thinking and policy that emboldens these screwballs.

and we go and send them hip high stacks of cash in response

They stopped pursuing them in 2015 under an international agreement for sanctions relief.

The transfer of money and assets was part of abiding by an old agreement.

Now that the US has backed out the deal for no reason, since by accounts of the IAEA Iran abided by the agreed deal, there is no real reason for them to follow the agreement anymore. Now that they don’t need to follow the agreement anymore and have shown indications of manufacturing weapons grade material… something that the IAEA said had stopped happening… what happens next?

did we have possession of that cash which we then sent them? yes or no?

Only the $1.7 Billion of their money from the 70’s … with interest.

i love the “their money” narrative that we just have held on to for decades and them up and decided to send to them in cargo planes in the dark of night.

Auto129 · 2020-01-10T01:09:45.930Z

Just Democrat hysteria?

There was bipartisan discussion about the possibility of war all Tuesday evening–while we sat here waiting to find out if there were American casualties from an Iranian missile attack.

thinkingman · 2020-01-10T01:10:03.117Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

altair1013:

Jezcoe:

Show that there was no deal in place that was limiting Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

There was a deal. That doesn’t mean they were following it. They were working to develop a nuke. No doubt about it.

that is obvious to us.

but common sense doesnt apply in leftyland

Any proof that they were not following the agreement?

their admission that they will not follow the agreement count?

Show me.

seriously?

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/05/iran-will-no-longer-abide-by-any-limits-on-uranium-enrichment-under-2015-nuclear-deal-state-tv.html

That was after the US pulled out of the deal

indicates to the thinking man how serious they were in abiding

Jezcoe · 2020-01-10T01:10:59.602Z

thinkingman:

i love the “their money” narrative that we just have held on to for decades and them up and decided to send to them in cargo planes in the dark of night.

It was their money, with interest.

How else should it have been sent?

Cashier’s Check?

thinkingman · 2020-01-10T01:11:37.220Z

“death to america” - Iran since 1979

thinkingman · 2020-01-10T01:12:00.209Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

i love the “their money” narrative that we just have held on to for decades and them up and decided to send to them in cargo planes in the dark of night.

It was their money, with interest.

How else should it have been sent?

Cashier’s Check?

how about not give them stacks of cash

Jezcoe · 2020-01-10T01:12:22.973Z

thinkingman:

indicates to the thinking man how serious they were in abiding

The US pulled out of the deal first and started to impose sanctions.

Why should they stay in a deal that the US pulled out of?

Jezcoe · 2020-01-10T01:13:10.698Z

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

i love the “their money” narrative that we just have held on to for decades and them up and decided to send to them in cargo planes in the dark of night.

It was their money, with interest.

How else should it have been sent?

Cashier’s Check?

how about not give them stacks of cash

So… how should their money have been delivered?

The US doesn’t have a banking agreement with Iran.

thinkingman · 2020-01-10T01:13:37.442Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

indicates to the thinking man how serious they were in abiding

The US pulled out of the deal first and started to impose sanctions.

Why should they stay in a deal that the US pulled out of?

why should they abide by it to begin with?

they dont exactly have a track record of honesty and global best interest