102

Me neither.

The state of New York didn’t see fit to lock up Sean Pica for life for killing his classmate’s waste product of a sperm donor, either.

Pica rid the universe of vermin that beat his half his size and dialysis wife, then started raping his eldest daughter. When he started on the younger, she contracted with Mr. Pica to kill him:

Job well done! Hopefully the McAllen men won’t get much time, if any.

Here’s more:

1 Like
103

They should get some, but personally if I were the judge, I wouldn’t give them more than 2 years.

Mitigating circumstances and all.

1 Like
104

NK and Iran feel the same way.

105

How did the boys know with 100% certainly that there was sexual abuse?

106

It’s become pretty obvious that many Democrat run regions are not ocieties of law and order.

If law-enforcement are not doing their job, citizens may need to. Did they report the step-father to authorities first? would be my question.

1 Like
107

Knee jerk partisan reaction noted. This was Texas. Was the system even allowed to react, or did these thugs just go vigilante?

I find it interesting that you don’t start with this. Shouldn’t this be where you start?

1 Like
108

⁹m[quote=“Supreme_War_Pig, post:107, topic:241264, full:true”]

Knee jerk partisan reaction noted. This was Texas. Was the system even allowed to react, or did these thugs just go vigilante?

I find it interesting that you don’t start with this. Shouldn’t this be where you start?
[/quote]

I responded to your post before putting my position. Is that unreasonable?

109

How far do you live from this area?

110

You have an alternative?

We reach for it because the system also fails at punishment.

1 Like
111

It doesn’t. It also doesn’t allow for much “released on bail and raped/killed the 9 year-old girl”.

1 Like
112

Why? What purpose does 2 years serve? What will they “learn” from being in prison?

113

The Constitution also gave us the right to bear arms, but you sure want to limit that.

2 Likes
114

Quite aways.

115

I hadnt heard of that case…Thanks for posting.

2 Likes
116

Does BLM have the right to riot, loot and burn down businesses for alleged civil rights violations committed against black criminals? You guys sure seem very selective in your outrage over vigilante justice. The rapist was a scumbag.

Personally I like the Old Testament practice of stoning scumbags to death, but then if we brought that back, Lib politicians would end up losing a lot of their base…Can’t have that!

5 Likes
117

That is a really good point.

They seem to support everything that breaks down law and order, and against anything that promotes law and order. Kind of like the whole Rittenhouse issue. You got a 18yo kid out there trying to help his community and stop people from vandalizing, looting and starting fires. He cleans up graffiti. He puts out a dumpster fire by himself. But to three degenerates, cant have that. One of them (Child Molester) ends up bringing a skateboard to a gun fight. He loses his life. along with another degenerate and bicep boy gets his arm shot off for pointing a pistol at him. And these people wanted Rittenhouse put in jail! He was the only sane one of the bunch! That was his community. He had more of a right to be there than the outside agitators.

5 Likes
118

Excellent question.

119

I’m not holding my breath waiting for an answer. Their actions speak louder than any words Libs here will ever say.

1 Like
120

Nope. Those groups didn’t have the right to riot.

121

What does “right” have to do with it? They have the “right” to revolt, overthrow the existing government and form a new one.