What kind of retribution will Tucker Carlson face for exposing lies and misinformation about 1/6?

Orygun · 2021-10-29T15:52:37.828Z

DougBH:

Because she has been hanging around with her woke Dem friends too long. There is no way that trying to silence journalists from exercising first amendment rights can be mistaken for caring about the sanctity of the republic, unless we are talking about the Republic of China.

Why do you think she is risking her career and destroying her relationship with the Right even though she has one of the most conservative voting records?

DougBH · 2021-10-29T15:52:59.442Z

FreeAndClear:

DougBH:

Because she has been hanging around with her woke Dem friends too long. There is no way that trying to silence journalists from exercising first amendment rights can be mistaken for caring about the sanctity of the republic, unless we are talking about the Republic of China.

Wait, who is a journalist?

Politicians don’t get to make that decision…not yet.

Bill.in.PA · 2021-10-29T15:53:35.470Z

He has spoken the truth in the past and provides evidence to support his conclusions. For example, he interviewed Tony Bobulinski, who confirmed key emails from the Hunter Biden laptop story.

At the time virtually all the corporate media was obeying the state-imposed media blackout of the story and repeating the lies about “Russian disinformation” coming from the US intelligence community.

FreeAndClear · 2021-10-29T15:54:54.427Z

DougBH:

FreeAndClear:

DougBH:

Because she has been hanging around with her woke Dem friends too long. There is no way that trying to silence journalists from exercising first amendment rights can be mistaken for caring about the sanctity of the republic, unless we are talking about the Republic of China.

Wait, who is a journalist?

Politicians don’t get to make that decision…not yet.

No they don’t. But we get to throw that word around while at the same time dismissing the need for journalistic integrity since technically not a journalist. But he is when someone says something about silencing. But he is really not when we are accused of stating his opinion as fact. But he is …. And round and round we go

Jezcoe · 2021-10-29T15:55:37.973Z

Bill.in.PA:

He has spoken the truth in the past and provides evidence to support his conclusions. For example, he interviewed Tony Bobulinski, who confirmed key emails from the Hunter Biden laptop story.

At the time virtually all the corporate media was obeying the state-imposed media blackout of the story and repeating the lies about “Russian disinformation” coming from the US intelligence community.

Yeah… Bobulinski…the guy who casually dropped that he has “Q level” clearance.

Totally on the level.

FreeAndClear · 2021-10-29T15:56:07.793Z

Bill.in.PA:

He has spoken the truth in the past and provides evidence to support his conclusions. For example, he interviewed Tony Bobulinski, who confirmed key emails from the Hunter Biden laptop story.

At the time virtually all the corporate media was obeying the state-imposed media blackout of the story and repeating the lies about “Russian disinformation” coming from the US intelligence community.

See @DougBH opinion presented as fact. Journalist!!!

DougBH · 2021-10-29T15:57:20.550Z

Q level clearance is a real thing. Drop the conspiracy theories.

FreeAndClear · 2021-10-29T15:57:58.339Z

DougBH:

Q level clearance is a real thing. Drop the conspiracy theories.

So is Mr bobunlibski. He is real too.

Bill.in.PA · 2021-10-29T15:58:43.372Z

en.wikipedia.org

Q clearance

Q clearance or Q access authorization is the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) security clearance required to access Top Secret Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, and National Security Information, as well as Secret Restricted Data. Restricted Data (RD) is defined in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and covers nuclear weapons and related materials. The lower-level L clearance is sufficient for access to Secret Formerly Restricted Data (FRD) and National Security Information, as well as Confide...

Jezcoe · 2021-10-29T15:59:44.900Z

DougBH:

Q level clearance is a real thing. Drop the conspiracy theories.

I mean… why just drop it in an interview?

I know probably why.

Jezcoe · 2021-10-29T16:00:20.906Z

Bill.in.PA:

Q clearance - Wikipedia

You can trust me… I have wink Q Clearance wink

DougBH · 2021-10-29T16:00:35.672Z

Because it was relevant to the discussion?

Jezcoe · 2021-10-29T16:00:46.412Z

DougBH:

Because it was relevant to the discussion?

Nope… not one bit.

DougBH · 2021-10-29T16:01:31.273Z

Jezcoe:

DougBH:

Because it was relevant to the discussion?

Nope… not one bit.

Your opinion. And I want to see video of that wink you claim he made.

Liberty323 · 2021-10-29T16:34:41.388Z

TommyLucchese:

Orygun:

None. He will see a greater ratings share with increased viewership. And no Tucker doesn’t believe a word of it.

Oh come on why don’t you believe that the Ivy League educated heir to the Swanson TV dinner fortune isn’t a regular blue collar Joe looking out for the little guy.

Why do you believe most of Hollywood, most Ivy League professors and administration, most music executives, most sports team owners, and most lawyers are looking out for the little guy?

TommyLucchese · 2021-10-29T17:08:12.244Z

Liberty323:

Why do you believe most of Hollywood, most Ivy League professors and administration, most music executives, most sports team owners, and most lawyers are looking out for the little guy?

I don’t. Unlike you, I don’t believe people just because they say they’re on my side and unstintingly support them. Trusting the overclass is a mug’s game.

I dunno how many thousands of threads there have to be with some liberal doofus doing dumb ■■■■ and the liberals here are like, yeah he’s an ■■■■■■■ and you guys just persist in this.

Liberty323 · 2021-10-29T18:16:47.634Z

TommyLucchese:

Liberty323:

Why do you believe most of Hollywood, most Ivy League professors and administration, most music executives, most sports team owners, and most lawyers are looking out for the little guy?

I don’t. Unlike you, I don’t believe people just because they say they’re on my side and unstintingly support them. Trusting the overclass is a mug’s game.

I dunno how many thousands of threads there have to be with some liberal doofus doing dumb ■■■■ and the liberals here are like, yeah he’s an ■■■■■■■ and you guys just persist in this.

Not me; I was a Ron Paul supporter and he was hosed by his own party, so I have trust issues with the GOP and “conservative” media when it comes to politics. I’ll be looking forward to reading your posts denigrating celebrities’ faux support of the little guys while they campaign for the Dems.

Jezcoe · 2021-10-29T18:19:32.852Z

TommyLucchese:

Liberty323:

Why do you believe most of Hollywood, most Ivy League professors and administration, most music executives, most sports team owners, and most lawyers are looking out for the little guy?

I don’t. Unlike you, I don’t believe people just because they say they’re on my side and unstintingly support them. Trusting the overclass is a mug’s game.

I dunno how many thousands of threads there have to be with some liberal doofus doing dumb ■■■■ and the liberals here are like, yeah he’s an ■■■■■■■ and you guys just persist in this.

There was one time where I was criticized for not being harsher to some liberal dum dum who did something dumb.

Even then some won’t take the win.

Liberty323 · 2021-10-29T19:30:58.875Z

My statement to Tommy was a response. Perhaps you should have included what he said first for proper context.

TommyLucchese · 2021-10-29T19:42:41.488Z

Liberty323:

I’ll be looking forward to reading your posts denigrating celebrities’ faux support of the little guys while they campaign for the Dems.

Lol all these years and you think I care about celebrities. They can all die in a fire. Most people can when they bring it on themselves.