VERY often actually. Most of the major civil rights and civil liberties cases of the 1950’s and 1960’s under the Warren Court directly overturned previous precedent.
Starting in 1937, the Supreme Court overturned virtually its entire commerce clause jurisprudence under threat of court packing, i.e. “the switch in time that saved nine.” Overturning precedent is nothing new at all.
If that’s the case then clearly the title (Conservative U.S. justices draw criticism by overruling precedent again) of the article I linked is actually misleading.
Society has a tendency to elevate certain groups of people and often forgets that they are just human beings no better than the rest of us with emotions, feelings, predispositions, etc.
When I was kid I use to mow the greens around old cemetery, the newest headstone was dated 1864. The owner had sign that said as Safiel pointed out daylight hours only. I’ve never seen anyone ever visiting those graves during my entire years growing up. But the own every Christmas put small reefs on there graves.
It’s still there after 40 years, signs still says daylight hours only. Whether it is maintain I do not know.
IMO Sacred grounds are still Sacred grounds regardless who owns them.
The only issue I would have is if the property owner tried to remove the grave without public approval, I don’t have an issue with small family cemeteries on private land being closed.