No, he didn’t.

1 Like

So ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies.

Sure, but it’s not a rule.

My soon-to-be daughter in law is also clinical and everything but the fitted respirators are on her tab.

I thought they were really short of medical personnel?

1 Like

Actually it is.

We literally called our termination seminar “It’s just not working out”.

1 Like

What is the ‘it’?

Thanks. You apparently know more than the insurance agents.

I already explained the premiums.

Which ties into the thread. If I have an employee who is disabled from me requiring the vaccine or who is damaged as a result (I gave a great example of not being at fault) and my Worker Comp rates reach the threshold that I cannot be insured, what then?

Litigate.

If people want to take their dog’s Heartgard and are willing to accept the consequences, it’s their choice. Not sure where they’d get ahold of monoclonal antiboidies.

1 Like

If that is a concern with the vaccine… would that also be a concern if that same employee caught Covid while at work and had long term affects?

Is it? Or is that just where it starts?

1 Like

Grenada trained lawyers might be able win the unsafe working conditions suit …

1 Like

Umm monoclonal antibodies is accepted treatment now, try to keep up.

Employer providing those uniforms. A rule.

It seems the comment was about supply.

Not ‘those’ uniforms. Just uniforms. Not enough internal consistency to draw a rule.

Rule: punch a bouncer, get removed from establishment.

Not a rule: go into bar, get punched by bouncer.

When every employer in the United States mandates vaccination for employment there might be room for discussion.

Sure. Make the “choice” to get a monoclonal antibody treatment outside of a licensed healthcare provider.

1 Like

It is a rule. An OSHA rule.