What happens to weapons sent to Ukraine?

“We have fidelity for a short time, but when it enters the fog of war, we have almost zero,” said one source briefed on US intelligence. “It drops into a big black hole, and you have almost no sense of it at all after a short period of time. . .”

Privately, officials recognize that Ukraine has an incentive to give only information that will bolster their case for more aid, more arms and more diplomatic assistance.
“It’s a war – everything they do and say publicly is designed to help them win the war. Every public statement is an information operation, every interview, every Zelensky appearance broadcast is an information operation,” said another source familiar with western intelligence.

Meanwhile Ukraine is rapidly running through NATO’s stock of anti-tank weapons. The stock was built up over many years, there is no way that production of new weapons can keep up with the losses.

At the same time, a video allegedly showing Russian rebels buying an armored vehicle from Ukrainian soldiers has emerged. It must be Russian propaganda . . .

Is the Ukrainian war sustainable given the rapid depletion of NATO weapons stocks?

How much of the weapons end up getting sold on the black market?

How long will it take China or Russia to replicate the weapons?

Yeah, we should probably just let those dummies die, right?


They aren’t being given anything the Russians haven’t already seen

A negotiated cease fire should be the top priority if the US government is really concerned about saving lives. Instead the US appears to have done everything it could to provoke the war and it continues to block any real progress towards a cease fire.

The Pentagon’s objective appears to be war-forever that maximizes profits for American arms merchants. Millions of Ukrainians are likely to die in that scenario. If you doubt that, just look at Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.

EU and NATO. If they really wanted to save lives and have peace they should have leave/left buffer states neutral.

Is about to be joined by Finland and Sweden


Yes. The US refused to negotiate NATO membership for Ukraine. Why would we do that unless we wanted to start a war?

Arming neo-Nazis and putting them on the Russian border has been highly provocative as well. Something about millions of war dead makes Russian freak out about things like that. Of course bulging veins would be a real provocation . . .

How is refusing to admit them into NATO provoking a war

Yes, there was a time when NATO was a defensive organization. That went out the window in when NATO started “humanitarian bombings” in Yugoslavia, Libya, etc.

Biden offered membership. If that was an error, the administration did nothing to correct it.

And today we have Russia committing outright genocide in a neighboring country

Cite the press release of Biden offering membership. It never happened

Russia will dictate the peace terms in Ukraine.

Either that or else NATO will have to send in its own combat troops. If that happens there is high risk or the conflict turning into World War III.

…spend the next decade impoverished. And rightfully so


Yes, the term genocide has come to be applied to anything elites in Washington don’t like.

Millions may die as result of starvation and malnutrition as NATO sanctions cut availability of food and fertilizer. Is that genocide?

And in this case it’s actual genocide. They are killing or rounding up all make Ukranians.

But on the upside Putin succeeded into turning Rissia into a third world country

That’s all on Putin. He didn’t have to invade and slaughter a neighboring country and can stop at any time

Ukraine was the buffer state. It was not in the EU or NATO.

Don’t play stupid…