I think youâre having some reading comprehension issues.
Stop trying to change the subject. Weâre talking about sanctuary city laws.
No. You are. While claiming Iâm the one changing the subject. Try reading the first post you responded to again and quote where I said anything about Sanctuary City policies. I specifically mentioned the governor of Oregon as a self proclaimed Sanctuary State signing State laws that violate Federal laws.
No, I really donât think I am.
Sanctuary cities. Thatâs what weâre talking about.
You have fun with that. 
When you want want to chime in on what I was actually talking about, feel free. 
I have no interest in talking about whatever you think you were talking about.
This thread is about immigration. Youâre the one who brought up sanctuary cities in the first place - but apparently youâre secretly talking about something else.
No I didnât. But you keep on being you.
Try reading that again. Tell me which part youâre confused about. Did I not use the words State or law enough times? Or are you simply trying to reframe the discussion to make your argument? As usual.
Itâs right there in the second sentence.
Sanctuary states? Yeah I can see how that would be confusing.
Distintiction without a difference. Sanctuary state laws are the same as sanctuary city laws.
No they arent. Policy to not enforce Federal laws is not the same as State laws making enforcement of Federal laws illegal. As Iâve repeatedly stated.
There are no âsanctuary stateâ laws making enforcement of Federal laws illegal.
Of course there are. If any State employee chooses to cooperate with Federal agencies in locating or apprehending illegal aliens, they are commiting a crime under State law. Unlike a sanctuary City policy where employees can choose not to cooperate without repurcussion, the State has made it illegal to do so.
Eclipze
201
You could either keep digging, which I prefer, because I just popped another bag of popcorn, or you could just own up to the fact that what youâre trying to prove doesnât exist. I hope you choose the first.
2 Likes
Well, first of all - thatâs not what you claimed. Forbidding state employees from helping Federal law enforcement is not the same thing as making enforcement of federal law illegal.
Second, what state are you talking about, specifically? Show me the law.
Uh huh. Because you say so?
Oregon. Just how many sanctuary states do you think there are exactly?
Says the guy who also said I brought up sanctuary cities.
No, because theyâre different things. Not the same. Are you living in this same reality with the rest of us?
Hereâs Oregonâs sanctuary state law. Tell me which part of it makes it a crime to cooperate with federal law enforcement.
Says the guy who is floundering so hard, heâs resorting to pedantry.
1 Like
