WuWei
42
Do they need āevidenceā?
WuWei
45
They use reasonable suspicion to get probable cause. Every see them run a drug dog around the outside of a car. Once the dog āalertsā, theyāll dismantle the car.
The handlers are cueing the dogs.
1 Like
WuWei
46
Most of it. The laws need to be changed. Most of this crap is War on Drugs stuff.

Thereās always some crisis.
WuWei
47
A lot of cops and bureaucrats believe the exact same thing.
2 Likes
I know. And itās absolutely terrifying.
1 Like
WuWei
51
Opening gates, peeking in windows, lyng, assumption of truth by the courts (privilege).
Just one thing after another.
WuWei
52
Hereās another favorite; āWe got a call and that gives us a right to ID you.ā
Is a call āreasonableā suspicion or probable cause?
āGet your hands out of your pockets!ā
1 Like
komobu
53
Pointless and argumentative. Save your concerns for the Judge. With the police, it just escalates things. Do you really think a Police Officer is going to say āYour right Mr Jones, I have no idea what I suspect you of. Have a nice dayā?
STODR
56
There are plenty of videos out there of them letting them go after that. Granted it normally takes a supervisor to do it and some time.
Those who say the order is legitimate if grounded in the law (strangely enough) ignore that many laws are unconstitutional.
A friend of mine was a County Sheriff. He was required to carry his badge and gun whenever he was in public. I asked him about him responding to anything when he was off duty. And he told me that he was obligated to respond to any illegal activity whenever he saw it or was called to assist. He also told me that the majority of his training was the law with a specific focus on citizens rights under the law.
1 Like
komobu
59
Usually the Police Officer.
WuWei
60
āLetting them go afterā is a problem for me.
WuWei
61
Thatās right. Do I have a right to know what I am accused of? Before the trial?
I say yes.