What constitutes a "lawful" order from police?

WuWei · 2022-12-08T17:17:51.858Z

There is no right to privacy in public. If you want privacy, you have to create it.

There are no safety issues.

WuWei · 2022-12-08T17:18:35.916Z

Optrader:

WuWei:

Signs, locked gates, doors, walls, badge readers, guards.

I agree and I wouldn’t be surprised if that police station put those things in place. We have these things where I work, not to mention metal detectors that members of the public have to go through for entry…Yet despite all these things, we still get a lot of trouble that has to be dealt with.

Good for them. Until they do…

BlueHeron · 2022-12-08T19:28:24.868Z

Optrader:

There is a difference between the lobby if a building and going office to office harassing people who are just trying to do their job. Also, even public buildings have areas with restricted access. Even janitorial closets where supplies and equipment are kept are locked from public access, and for that matter, government buildings are locked after hours. There has to be a balance between the public’s right to accountability and the employees right to privacy and safety while they work.

There are dozens of videos available where the photographers are photographing right in front of the sign saying it’s legal. And yet they STILL detain. Illegally.

BlueHeron · 2022-12-08T19:30:33.275Z

Optrader:

I agree and I wouldn’t be surprised if that police station put those things in place. We have these things where I work, not to mention metal detectors that members of the public have to go through for entry…Yet despite all these things, we still get a lot of trouble that has to be dealt with.

How about when someone is taking photos of a police station from a PUBLIC sidewalk. A building that is in plain view of every citizen? Should cops detain/arrest for that?

Optrader · 2022-12-08T20:27:56.962Z

WuWei:

There is no right to privacy in public. If you want privacy, you have to create it.

There are no safety issues.

There aren’t many places that are inherently private. Even in your own house or yard, there are people who will spy on you from public locations, or locations that you can’t control. I get that privacy has to be created, but the underlying question is: should public employees have the same rights in creating and enforcing that privacy as private sector employees?

I don’t know where you work, but I’m guessing you would not like it if someone walked in off the street into your workplace and started taking videos of you, asking obnoxious questions and demanding to be let into places in your building just because…I’m guessing you or your employer would insist the person leave or the police would be called. Your place of business may be able to ban the person, or even have the person arrested and charged with trespassing if they don’t leave.

This is what I’m talking about when I say privacy and safety. How far should we be able to go in creating a safe and private workplace? How do we deal with people who violate what we create? Should public employees, including police stations not have the same rights and expectations of private sector employees?

Optrader · 2022-12-08T21:22:38.073Z

BlueHeron:

Optrader:

I agree and I wouldn’t be surprised if that police station put those things in place. We have these things where I work, not to mention metal detectors that members of the public have to go through for entry…Yet despite all these things, we still get a lot of trouble that has to be dealt with.

How about when someone is taking photos of a police station from a PUBLIC sidewalk. A building that is in plain view of every citizen? Should cops detain/arrest for that?

Just for that? Of course not.

WuWei · 2022-12-08T21:52:30.509Z

I don’t work for the government anymore.

BlueHeron · 2022-12-08T23:37:05.386Z

Optrader:

Just for that? Of course not.

Of course not? Cops do it often! There’s a guy on YouTube that makes a living doing just that. He sues the town and wins. And the people have to pay. Every time.

Samm · 2022-12-08T23:52:06.218Z

Link?

BlueHeron · 2022-12-09T00:01:53.926Z

Samm:

Link?

Here’s one. This guy goes all over!

Samm · 2022-12-09T00:03:08.351Z

No … I mean about the part where you said the guy sues towns and wins.

Optrader · 2022-12-09T00:07:47.109Z

WuWei:

I don’t work for the government anymore.

I do…

BlueHeron · 2022-12-09T00:16:38.460Z

Samm:

No … I mean about the part where you said the guy sues towns and wins.

Here’s an older piece, from when they were first getting popular on YouTube. Not sure which of the two auditers are who, they use a few different platforms with different monikers.

New York Post – 24 Jul 21

‘First Amendment auditors’ aim to cancel cops via YouTube

Armed with camera phones and prickly attitudes, a new generation of agitators is making big bucks by getting in the face of officers in public places.

Samm · 2022-12-09T00:20:05.902Z

He’s making his money by getting followers on YouTube, not by suing the towns.

WuWei · 2022-12-09T00:34:07.462Z

Optrader:

WuWei:

I don’t work for the government anymore.

I do…

Make sure you comb your hair.

BlueHeron · 2022-12-09T00:42:35.608Z

Samm:

He’s making his money by getting followers on YouTube, not by suing the towns.

And by winning lawsuits.

image1920×2475 252 KB

Optrader · 2022-12-09T00:44:39.814Z

WuWei:

Optrader:

WuWei:

I don’t work for the government anymore.

I do…

Make sure you comb your hair.

23 years… I have the drill down well.

WuWei · 2022-12-09T00:45:11.364Z

Want to represent well in the video.

Samm · 2022-12-09T00:46:32.947Z

BlueHeron:

Samm:

He’s making his money by getting followers on YouTube, not by suing the towns.

And by winning lawsuits.

Okay …

But then, that’s the only thing that will give Towns and Cities incentive to reign in ignorant and power abusing cops.

Optrader · 2022-12-09T00:47:39.374Z

WuWei:

Want to represent well in the video.

Want to retire with FULL benefits…