You certainly did project that a trial does not take place, and a jury does not find the accused guilty before being sentenced. Stop making ■■■■ up.
I specifically stated:
My feeling under the conditions is to have the families of victims affected by the intentional propaganda in question, e.g., the families of Laken Riley, is to allow them to decide the appropriate punishment.
I mentioned nothing about not having a trial to determine guilt or innocence.
Stop making ■■■■ up.
Here we go the word parsing and deflection. Dude its not that deep. You said the victims shoudl decide the punishment. Yes or no answer - does that include life imprisonment or the death penalty?
No deflections of projecting on my part. I stated my position in crystal clear language:
My feeling under the conditions is to have the families of victims affected by the intentional propaganda in question, e.g., the families of Laken Riley, is to allow them to decide the appropriate punishment.
Libs have been revenging on trump for the past six years, not that he did not deserve some criticism.
But it is a clear example of one sided deception and Derangement Syndrome.
Bout all i can say
No, of course not. We have a system of courts and law, let us avail ourselves of them.
Ya, the court of liberal progressive narrative.
No, families or victims should never decide the punishment. That clear enough for you?
