WH Launches Website to Report Social Media Censorship

[altair1013]

@CanadianJudo

Why don’t you create a Republican Facebook?

Because I’m not a big fan of republicans. I prefer conservatives.

[Paul_Thomson]

Provide a link to him saying that. You will notice that of all the “news” sites propagating the myth that he **thinks"" that, none include a link to him within the last thirteen years actually saying he believes that.

[CanadianJudo]

He is being sued for it in court.

[Paul_Thomson]

1. They did sue him.
2. Those lawsuits failed, because the claim was false and lacked any evidence
3. Now he’s countersuing.

But the same people who falsely informed you in the first instance, are not informing you of the second and third.

[party-free]

Huh? You got sources for these claims?

[party-free]

“Yeah, so, Sandy Hook is a synthetic completely fake with actors, in my view, manufactured.”

The media didn’t make up Jones saying that.

Or:

“And it just shows how bold they are, that they clearly used actors.”

[Weedhopper]

Why would you think silancing conservatives is not bulling?

[vaard]

@PurpnGold

@Jezcoe

I thought that at one time whitehouse . Com was a porn site… like in the 90’s.

Or was that a fever dream

It’s real

https://twitter.com/whitehouse/status/1128765001223663617?s=21

They have a government site resolve to a survey site.

The reports concerning this forum might break tbeir site…

[vaard]

@zantax

It will happen eventually, just a matter of time before people get fed up with the censorship and move to other platforms, lot of inertia to overcome though.

Eh… if they were going to leave here they would have done it by now…

[vaard]

@Weedhopper

Why would you think silancing conservatives is not bulling?

Why is just silencing conservatives considered bullying?

[party-free]

Why is people breaking the rules of a site and being banned considered “silencing” them?

[PurpnGold]

@party-free

Why is people breaking the rules of a site and being banned considered “silencing” them?

I have yet to see any con put forth a story we’re a con was banned from a social media site STRICTLY because they are conservative AND NOT because they are doing things that violate terms and conditions.

[H_Arendt]

So is a political campaign sharing polling data with a hostile foreign government and accepting their stolen e-mails to smear your opponent but I have a suspicion that such activities don’t bother you nearly as much.

You appear to have enormous faith in the power of government to operate appropriately. This seems a very strange point of view for a conservative.

[H_Arendt]

If there is demand for all this “censored” content then the free market will create outlets for the demand.

Weighing in to protect the content you prefer regardless of market demand, that’s just socialism. See how easy it is to embrace socialism, altair? Happens to the best of us.

Next thing, we’ll hear you and AOC are an item.

[party-free]

And it’s almost like they forgot that asshats like Louis Farrakhan also got “silenced.” I’m sure they’ll love to know he’s part of the cause they’re supporting

[Bodecea]

@altair1013

@Bodecea

Of course you like the idea…tattling because you don’t like what someone said is very very CRC.

Thank you for your judgement of me. Actually this has very little do with me what so ever. Surprisingly, I was not consulted. But I think you are confused. A private company is allowed to silence people for their political beliefs. But they should not expect to be free of criticism when they do it. Especially when they lie and claim they are not doing it. You agree?

BTW what’s CRC?

CRC - con-servative republican christian

[Bodecea]

@PurpnGold

@party-free

Why is people breaking the rules of a site and being banned considered “silencing” them?

I have yet to see any con put forth a story we’re a con was banned from a social media site STRICTLY because they are conservative AND NOT because they are doing things that violate terms and conditions.

And you won’t either.

[Forcefield]

@Paul_Thomson

Facebook banned Alex Jones for antisemitic comments posted to his page by others using those comments as an excuse for deplatforming him because he was promoting conservative anti-liberal anti-globalist views. Paypal also banned him from their service without citing a single specific incident of TOS infringement.

Facebook is chock full of conservative anti-semite nutjobs just like Alex Jones who are not banned.

[Bodecea]

@Paul_Thomson

Facebook banned Alex Jones for antisemitic comments posted to his page by others using those comments as an excuse for deplatforming him because he was promoting conservative anti-liberal anti-globalist views. Paypal also banned him from their service without citing a single specific incident of TOS infringement.

Kindly prove both of those assertions. TIA.

[blueapplepaste]

Negative. That’s a new one for me.