wE're NoT cOmiNg fOr YOur gUnS! WE rEsPeCt tHe 2Nd AmEndMenT!

WuWei · 2022-07-31T14:06:26.679Z

sikofit:

WuWei:

They’re not just banning “assault weapons”.

They aren’t banning anything. This has zero chance of passing and is is nothing more than an attempt to placate progressives before the mid-terms

Yes, they are. It passed the House. You would explode if this happened with any other right. Look at how you reacted over the Dobbs decision, which actually didn’t ban anything.

This is where the ressentiment comes from.

WuWei · 2022-07-31T14:07:11.905Z

sikofit:

BraveGear:

sikofit:

They aren’t banning anything. This has zero chance of passing and is is nothing more than an attempt to placate progressives before the mid-terms

Democrats made the attempt. Never forget.

But they actually didn’t. There wasn’t a single person who voted for it that thought it has a snowball’s chance in hell of passing. It’s lip-service to the progressive wing of the party, nothing more

It passed.

And they did it before.

EunPo3uXIAM_hQx691×865 86.7 KB

gaslight

WuWei · 2022-07-31T14:07:35.640Z

1994-2004.

sikofit · 2022-07-31T14:12:27.749Z

WuWei:

It passed .

Did it? I seemed to of missed the Senate vote

sikofit · 2022-07-31T14:17:29.083Z

WuWei:

1994-2004

Yeah? That only shows precedent of it being Constitutional not that the Senate is going to vote for it. When it comes to the Senate floor it gets 48 votes at best, most likely less

WuWei · 2022-07-31T14:22:40.505Z

sikofit:

WuWei:

It passed .

Did it? I seemed to of missed the Senate vote

Yes, it did.

And you’ve© done it before. 1994-2004.

WuWei · 2022-07-31T14:25:51.572Z

sikofit:

WuWei:

1994-2004

Yeah? That only shows precedent of it being Constitutional not that the Senate is going to vote for it. When it comes to the Senate floor it gets 48 votes at best, most likely less

No, it doesn’t “shows precedent of it being Constitutional”. Not a bit. You don’t know your history.

That doesn’t matter. Your© House, with the help of a couple of republican ■■■■ bags, passed a bill they know is unConstitutional. And Brandon would sign it in a second.

Once again, your tribe is 2/3rds of the way to pissing on my rights.

sikofit · 2022-07-31T14:27:09.631Z

WuWei:

Yes, it did.

No it didn’t

WuWei · 2022-07-31T14:27:35.797Z

I’d like to see your reaction to a republican House passing a bill for sodomy laws or a country-wide ban on abortions with a republican President in the chair.

sikofit · 2022-07-31T14:28:21.811Z

WuWei:

passed a bill they know is unConstitutional

If it’s unconstitutional how did it stand for 10 years before expiring?

WuWei · 2022-07-31T14:29:06.094Z

sikofit:

WuWei:

Yes, it did.

No it didn’t

Yes, it did. 217-213.

WuWei · 2022-07-31T14:29:20.234Z

sikofit:

WuWei:

passed a bill they know is unConstitutional

If it’s unconstitutional how did it stand for 10 years before expiring?

Do your research.

Mountain_Soldier · 2022-07-31T22:04:08.967Z

PurpnGold:

BraveGear:

PurpnGold:

Don’t worry, even if by some miracle it passes the senate, you won’t get your current guns taken away. You will just lose access to some arms. Just pretend like they were never invented. Problem solved.

It scares the ■■■■ out of me that people with your mindset can vote.

Is someone coming into your house to take your gun?

It was proposed in VA a couple years ago.

Mountain_Soldier · 2022-07-31T22:13:56.267Z

PurpnGold:

TheRedComet:

Lol full size and mid size Glocks run 17 round magazines and the compacts typically carry 13.

Sounds like an “assault” weapon if you ask me.

Remember the rallying cry. No one needs more than 10 rounds.

How does the bill define assault weapon? Would your typical Glock be excluded?

Yes it would- be banned that is.

“(41) The term ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’—

“(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device, including any such device joined or coupled with another in any manner, that has an overall capacity of, or that can be readily restored, changed, or converted to accept, more than 15 rounds of ammunition; and

“(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.”.

FloridaYankee · 2022-07-31T22:28:55.667Z

WuWei:

sikofit:

WuWei:

They’re not just banning “assault weapons”.

They aren’t banning anything. This has zero chance of passing and is is nothing more than an attempt to placate progressives before the mid-terms

Yes, they are. It passed the House. You would explode if this happened with any other right. Look at how you reacted over the Dobbs decision, which actually didn’t ban anything.

This is where the ressentiment comes from.

C’mon, they’ll never overturn Roe v Wade.

Oh wait…

Steel-W0LF · 2022-07-31T22:40:12.001Z

I almost wish they would ban everything.

Let’s get this show on the road and get it over with.

After it’s done the leftists can all move to new nanny state nations full of illegals, and the rest of us can refuse to let the leftists immigrate to our country when they go belly up.

WuWei · 2022-07-31T22:41:45.162Z

Apples and zebras. This isn’t SCOTUS.

I honestly didn’t think they would, although Roe was a bad decision.

bigtwnvin · 2022-08-01T00:06:14.345Z

This time.

bigtwnvin · 2022-08-01T00:12:11.924Z

So the Marlin 60 is in
The M1A is out?
Too bad both got lost in that tragic boating accident.

RTchoke · 2022-08-01T08:52:28.660Z

PurpnGold:

WuWei:

PurpnGold:

Just pretend those type of weapons never existed.

Like your ilk does with the 2nd?

Get a musket.

Get an inkwell.