Well well well, 87% in pilot program don't show up for Asylem hearings

[Snow96]

@Plasmaball

You bring down the forum by using them. They are trash.

That is only YOUR opinion.

Thanks for playing.

[Plasmaball]

That’s the opinion of almost everyone with a brain.

[calirepub]

@Snow96

@calirepub

World Net Daily are seen as more trustworthy.

World Nut Daily will NEVER be trustworthy. They could hire walter cronkite and I’d still call them Worl Dut Daily and call them broken clock media.

I said WND is being seen as more trustworthy.

Maybe you will never consider them to be trustworthy, but that’s just your opinion. Other people have other opinions.

This wouldn’t even be an issue if Fox News hadn’t jumped onto the liberal bandwagon. That’s my opinion.

[party-free]

@Snow96

If it’s what I consider a sketchy source you’ll see me call it a brocken clock source.

That’s Breitbart all right.

@Snow96

One problem, they were started well before Trump. Yes it is a conservative based media. Doesn’t make them non legit.

Uhh, yeah, notice that part where I said “AND THE GOP-they have been since they were founded.” Thanks for reaffirming what I said.

@Snow96

Havn’t looked it up. Another poster in the thread said they found the video of it however.

So you’re admitting you’re just taking Breitbart at their word with no additional scrutiny or research. That’s the problem right there, folks.

@Snow96

Now this is funny. How about you tell the left wing people that about Trump and alleged law breaking and money laundering and such. Many of the left wing take any whisper of impropriety as gospel.

I’m not responsible for anyone. This isn’t the first time I’ve had a Trump defender suggest I go tell left wing people something. How about just responding to the point I’m making to you?

@Snow96

What facts? I keep asking for people to post a link disproving. All I’ve gotten is somethign that nearly 2 years old.

Showing the claim has been made before, and debunked. And it provide the only facts, other than “someone said” in this situation.

[party-free]

The editor in chief admitting their slant toward Trump isn’t an opinion. How can he admit it but you can’t?

[DougBH]

What’s funny about that is to have an article critical of skewing their coverage politically in…CNN!

Come on, that was a joke, wasn’t it?

[madasheck]

@Snow96

@Plasmaball

You bring down the forum by using them. They are trash.

That is only YOUR opinion.

Thanks for playing.

I notice you haven’t replied to what I posted about Breitbart. I’d like to hear your comment about that.

[calirepub]

@madasheck

@Snow96

@Plasmaball

You bring down the forum by using them. They are trash.

That is only YOUR opinion.

Thanks for playing.

I notice you haven’t replied to what I posted about Breitbart. I’d like to hear your comment about that.

Everyone has an opinion about what is a legitimate news source. You don’t consider Breitbart to be legitimate. That’s fine. Snow doesn’t consider WND to be legitimate. Neither one of you is less right than the other. Let’s just call it a draw.

[party-free]

@DougBH

What’s funny about that is to have an article critical of skewing their coverage politically in… CNN!

I mean, the CNN article I posted is a direct interview CNN had with the editor-in-chief of Breitbart, wherein he admits Breitbart’s pro-Trump bias. Did you even click it?

[Snow96]

I’ve been a little busy sorry my schedule doesn’t match yours.

[gooddad409]

@madasheck

@Snow96

Hmmmmm

Some blogger saying someone has been arrested (did you even look for an article at a legit news source) . . .

Vs a legit news source reporting (and others here finding video evidence) about testimony before congress.

That’s not an apples to apples comparison, that’s apples to a brick wall.

Are you actually calling Breitbart a legit source? Just because Trump does doesn’t mean it is.

More legit than politifact,the NY times, washington post,cnn, or msnbc which are all arms of the dnc.

[party-free]

Well no, not remotely at all.

Breitbart ADMITS its own bias, that it is pro-Trump.

[gooddad409]

The lame stream media is firmly in the dnc camp. Everybody knows that.

[Jamerican]

@gooddad409

Hmmmmm

Some blogger saying someone has been arrested (did you even look for an article at a legit news source) . . .

Vs a legit news source reporting (and others here finding video evidence) about testimony before congress.

That’s not an apples to apples comparison, that’s apples to a brick wall.

Are you actually calling Breitbart a legit source? Just because Trump does doesn’t mean it is.

More legit than politifact,the NY times, washington post,cnn, or msnbc which are all arms of the dnc.

Now you know that’s not the truth. Yeah…those outlets are left leaning at times, but come on Breitbart is on the extreme end of not being a legit news source. Stop it!

[Konssurvative1]

So tell your boy Trump to stop the Program.

[DougBH]

@party-free

@DougBH

What’s funny about that is to have an article critical of skewing their coverage politically in… CNN!

I mean, the CNN article I posted is a direct interview CNN had with the editor-in-chief of Breitbart, wherein he admits Breitbart’s pro-Trump bias. Did you even click it?

If the editor in chief of Breitbart admits a bias in favor of Trump, and CNN does not admit a bias against Trump, my conclusion would be that Breitbart is more honest and therefore more believable than CNN.

[Roxiebelle]

The source is stated in the article

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials said that the agency had recently conducted a pilot program with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to test how many recent illegal aliens would show up to their asylum hearings after being released into the U.S.

[madasheck]

@Snow96

I’ve been a little busy sorry my schedule doesn’t match yours.

Haven’t heard that one before.

[madasheck]

@gooddad409

The lame stream media is firmly in the dnc camp. Everybody knows that.

Fake views.

[party-free]

Of course. No one would suspect otherwise.