164

Hey there! I was surprised to find my login still worked. 34 felony convictions dragged me into the happy abyss.

3 Likes
165

Russian disinformation and whores peeing in beds then.

166

Speaker Johnson is backing the “Donald Trump is a Special Boy” Bill which would allow for State charges against a President or Former President to be moved to Federal Courts.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4718236-johnson-presidents-state-cases-federal-court/

What a spineless sycophant

167

This is so bizarre.

168

Have they thought this one through? I’m guessing no, but this is a really big downside to miss.

1 Like
169

Congressional republicans have the attention span of a gnat.

1 Like
170

The guild will tell you your opinion…

1 Like
171

Excellent idea. We can’t have our national politics determined by little enclaves of extremists. I would add venue needs to be moved in any politically based trial to a place where no party controls more than 80% of the vote.

1 Like
172

The article quotes the bar as saying “words matter”. Yes, they do. Hence the first amendment,
This is just the Democrat controlled bar taking the Democrat principle of “how dare you notice what we have been doing” to the extreme.

3 Likes
173

Yes Felon Donald must always be special and different from every other citizen of this country.

174

sometimes they slip and explain the rig

2 Likes
175

They were forced into this since the laptop was used (as authentic) in Hunter’s gun/drug lawsuit.

Check this out:

Hunter Biden drops lawsuit against Rudy Giuliani over laptop data

6 Likes
176

It’s a civil lawsuit and Guiliani is dead broke.

Can’t get blood from a stone.

1 Like
177

That sounds ridiculous but i would love to see the letter

178

Turley is being a drama queen

Here is what he received

https://www.ctbar.org/news/cba-news/latestnews/news-detail/2024/06/14/a-message-from-the-cba-leadership

179

Me too.

180

Exactly what he says it said.

1 Like
181

There are no implications of ethical violations. Not even a little bit. That’s the drama part.

But that’s what’s sells blogs so i won’t begrudge him that.

182

Yes we’ve seen evidence of that right here.

183

Such statements can provoke acts of violence against those serving the public as employees of the judicial branch.

cross the line from criticism to dangerous rhetoric. They have no place in the public discourse.

we cannot let the charged political climate in which we live dismantle the third branch of government. To remain silent renders us complicit in that effort.

Shall we go to the code of ethics?