Weaponization Alert Biden DOJ sides with Trump in Trademark Case Before Supreme Court

Politics
1

In a matter that conflicts with claims about “weaponizing” DOJ but is consistent with President Biden’s focus bipartisanship, the DOJ is siding with former President Trump in matter the Supreme Court agreed to hear today.

At issue, is the effort of a Trump opponent to trademark a slogan that insults the former President so that items bearing the insult can be marketed.

The DOJ is arguing that trademark law prohibits trademarking the name of a living person without their consent. The contrary argument is that the trademark is a political slogan, but there is no question that the slogan includes the name Donald Trump and he has not given his consent.

I think Donald Trump is right in this matter and that the DOJ is right to support him. I wonder if the House investigations on weaponization of DOJ/FBI and so on should hold a hearing on this matter so all sides can be heard?

1 Like
2

I say no, Congressional oversight have more important things to investigate. For example, seeing that report made known by whistleblower where the FBI is maybe today going to let it be seen without redactions. Could be very damaging to Biden and escalate an impeachment inquiry sooner than later?

1 Like
3

Now…back up and open both eyes. There is no question the DoJ has been weaponized so one must ask themselves, why would they side this way? Hmmmmmmmmmmm…would it have any affect on the usage of “let’s go Brandon” for 2024?

1 Like
4

I provided an example ot the present DOJ siding with President Trump before the Supreme Court. Looking at it with both eyes, doesn’t that contradict your point of view. Why would Garland and Biden go to bat for the leading Republican contender for the nomination in your opinion?

5

I think the world is missing out on some great fiction writers with vivid imaginations

6

The very damaging report that Trump’s DOJ saw no reason to open an investigation into? That one? Right?

7

When you observe the actions of a DoJ that invaded the home of a former POTUS, that’s NEVER been done in our nation’s history, to recover “classified documents” which a POTUS has every right to declassify and keep…all while a VP, who does NOT have this right…has been given almost a free pass. There is NO QUESTION that there’s two-tiers of justice and the DoJ has been weaponized.

2 Likes
8

Let’s go Brandon doesn’t involve Joe Biden’s name and thus is irrelevant here.

1 Like
9

Could be? Good to see you my friend. Been missin u. :+1:

10

No could be about it.

It’s irrelevant.

Joe Biden has no control over Let’s Go Brandon the way Trump has over his own name.

11

Just curious, do you think Joe or Hunter Biden can potentially stop the mother who had the baby out of wedlock with the President’s son in court’s from using their last name, as I think the child’s legal name on the birth certificate is Navy Biden?

1 Like
12

How about a slogan “support Navy Biden”? Doesn’t she deserve recognition? She didn’t do anything wrong.

2 Likes
13

Navy Biden would have to give her consent…if that’s her legal name.

14

I don’t know the rules about last names…wouldn’t Hunter have to adopt her?

15

Why would he have to adopt his own child?

3 Likes
16

Even though Navy is a minor, either 4 or 5 years old?

17

Last I knew in the United States the mother can give the child either her last name or the fathers when she fills out the birth certificate.

18

Then her legal or natural guardian

19

That Navy’s mother, Lunden Roberts.

Just curious, could have Ms. Roberts legally decided to perhaps unilaterally already named her Navy Joan Biden instead of Navy Joan Roberts (on the birth certificate) from the get go, and without the fathers (Hunter) permission at the time instead?

20

Would need to check state laws for that.