"We must trust *the scientists*"?

[anon91495210]

Point is, I didn’t just trust an expert. Point is, I dug for information and made an informed decision. No one’s questioning that they can have unique knowledge but I’m definitely saying it’s idiotic to trust “experts” when their conclusions are obviously false and they have been wrong on every projection they’ve made.

[anon91495210]

You almost got there… when the data is WRONG, it’s CANNOT be objective data. Objective data is provable FACT. That is DEFINITELY not the case with the Covid data. Many of these fatalities are ASSUMED to be Covid related. Many are being proven to be falsely attributed to Covid. The mortality rate is calculated based on known cases, therefore the mortality rate is SUBJECTIVE. My point was Sneaky was spot on.

[Samm]

@tnt

How do you guys feel about trusting a man who has lied to you hundreds of times?

You are going to have to be more specific. That describes pretty much every politician in Washington.

[Borgia_dude]

@anon91495210

Objective data is provable FACT. That is DEFINITELY not the case with the Covid data. Many of these fatalities are ASSUMED to be Covid related. Many are being proven to be falsely attributed to Covid.

Can you provide your source for the Covid fatalities being inflated? Thanks.

[Samm]

@JayJay

@RTchoke

Don’t worry, CNN will make sure Greta tells you all how things should be.

DR. Rand Paul is not qualified to question Dr. Fauci’s advice but by golly Greta is qualified to sit a panel on covid-19 while libs scream to the scientists.

She’s not being included as an expert.

But I know it warms your heart to have another boogeyman to rail against.

Then why is she being included?

[Samm]

You didn’t actually listen to his words did you.

[Grande]

I saw a short clip today of Trump speaking yesterday at the WH.
I keyed in on Dr. Fauci behind him demonstrating his original analysis of why a mask can do more harm than good.
Honestly I had to laugh out loud.
Sorry I don’t have the skills to capture and post

[Samm]

@Borgia_dude

@anon91495210

Objective data is provable FACT. That is DEFINITELY not the case with the Covid data. Many of these fatalities are ASSUMED to be Covid related. Many are being proven to be falsely attributed to Covid.

Can you provide your source for the Covid fatalities being inflated? Thanks.

Sure. About 90% of all people who have been reported to have died of COVID-19 had one to three (or more) serious underlying health issues. Yet the cause is recorded simply as due to COVID-19.

[Borgia_dude]

@Samm

@Borgia_dude

@anon91495210

Objective data is provable FACT. That is DEFINITELY not the case with the Covid data. Many of these fatalities are ASSUMED to be Covid related. Many are being proven to be falsely attributed to Covid.

Can you provide your source for the Covid fatalities being inflated? Thanks.

Sure. About 90% of all people who have been reported to have died of COVID-19 had one to three (or more) serious underlying health issues. Yet the cause is recorded simply as due to COVID-19.

Hmmm…how many people died of AIDS?

[Samm]

None apparently, if they had COVID-19 when they died.

[RTchoke]

@Samson_Corwell

@RTchoke

Don’t worry, CNN will make sure Greta tells you all how things should be.

DR. Rand Paul is not qualified to question Dr. Fauci’s advice but by golly Greta is qualified to sit a panel on covid-19 while libs scream to the scientists.

Rand Paul is an opthamologist.

So what makes Greta such an expert on Covid that she is on a panel about it?

I notice you didn’t even bother with that ■■■■■■■■ at all. I know why.

[Borgia_dude]

@Samm

None apparently, if they had COVID-19 when they died.

How many people died of AIDS?

[RTchoke]

@Paul_Thomson

@Samson_Corwell

Rand Paul is an opthamologist.

Is that someone who trained as a general physician and then specialised in dealing with eyes? Or someone who has only trained in matters of the eyes?

Would he understand the difference between valid and bogus statistics?

Pretty sure he knows more about it in general than the “expert” Greta that CNN feels should be telling the world about how to deal with it.

[RTchoke]

@Samm

@JayJay

@RTchoke

Don’t worry, CNN will make sure Greta tells you all how things should be.

DR. Rand Paul is not qualified to question Dr. Fauci’s advice but by golly Greta is qualified to sit a panel on covid-19 while libs scream to the scientists.

She’s not being included as an expert.

But I know it warms your heart to have another boogeyman to rail against.

Then why is she being included?

They are purposely ignoring this line of questioning because there is no reason on Earth a 16 year old CG activist should be put on a panel to tell everyone else how to respond and deal with Covid.

[Borgia_dude]

@RTchoke

@Samm

@JayJay

@RTchoke

Don’t worry, CNN will make sure Greta tells you all how things should be.

DR. Rand Paul is not qualified to question Dr. Fauci’s advice but by golly Greta is qualified to sit a panel on covid-19 while libs scream to the scientists.

She’s not being included as an expert.

But I know it warms your heart to have another boogeyman to rail against.

Then why is she being included?

They are purposely ignoring this line of questioning because there is no reason on Earth a 16 year old CG activist should be put on a panel to tell everyone else how to respond and deal with Covid.

Was she invited on as an expert? Have other non-experts been invited to this panel in the past? It seems an objective person might ask those questions to gain enlightenment.

[Eagle-Keeper]

@WuWei

@SixFoot

Science is the new Religion.

High Modernism

High modernism (also known as high modernity ) is a form of modernity, characterized by an unfaltering confidence in science and technology as means to reorder the social and natural world.

Wiki

You could also call it the religion of secular humanism.

[WuWei]

@Eagle-Keeper

@WuWei

@SixFoot

Science is the new Religion.

High Modernism

High modernism (also known as high modernity ) is a form of modernity, characterized by an unfaltering confidence in science and technology as means to reorder the social and natural world.

Wiki

You could also call it the religion of secular humanism.

Fauci identifies his religion as humanist. I believe he was Catholic.

[Eagle-Keeper]

The tricky thing with the science of viruses, biology and biochemistry is that the number of variables is immense say when compared to the science of cell phones.

[RTchoke]

@Borgia_dude

@RTchoke

@Samm

@JayJay

@RTchoke

Don’t worry, CNN will make sure Greta tells you all how things should be.

DR. Rand Paul is not qualified to question Dr. Fauci’s advice but by golly Greta is qualified to sit a panel on covid-19 while libs scream to the scientists.

She’s not being included as an expert.

But I know it warms your heart to have another boogeyman to rail against.

Then why is she being included?

They are purposely ignoring this line of questioning because there is no reason on Earth a 16 year old CG activist should be put on a panel to tell everyone else how to respond and deal with Covid.

Was she invited on as an expert? Have other non-experts been invited to this panel in the past? It seems an objective person might ask those questions to gain enlightenment.

The fact libs are defending a 16 year old child as someone worthy of giving insight into this covid issue while stating Rand Paul has no valid reason to make assessments because he’s only an ophthalmologist makes it very difficult to take anything libs say about this seriously.

[JayJay]

Because she’s a media star and adds some spice to what is likely an otherwise boring panel.

Theatre.

The better question is ask is why it matters to you so much.