Way to go Joe! BTW, where's my

[adroit]

@Optrader

If you bothered to check statisics, you’d discover that the number of times that delivering a baby would endanger the life of the mother is very small, I believe we’ll under 1%. Let’s clarify something else here too…

Carrying to term statistically imposes a much greater risk to the mother’s life than abortion. Carrying to term also comes with it a 30% chance at being gutted. If not gutted, it carries a 95% chance that the woman’s genitals will tear. There are other risks of health complications as well.

No human has the right to impose those risks on a woman.

[FreeAndClear]

Right to privacy. Both Casey and Roe restrict the right to privacy and weigh it against the rights of the unborn child

[adroit]

What’s the term for being forced to endure a great amount of pain for a sustained amount of time against your will?

[adroit]

What’s the term for being forced to use your body to perform a particular task for a sustained amount of time against your will?

[FreeAndClear]

Refined interrogation technique

[CanadianJudo]

Unless your the Pope you dont get to decide if somone is catholic or not

[Optrader]

@sikofit

@Optrader

In my destruction of a Nation thread over in the RF, one of my points is that the nuclear family (i.e., father, mother and children) is under attack, and anything that undermines and destroys the family, helps destroy us as a nation.

The nuclear family as a point of stability is a farce. I would take 2 gay fathers over the father who molests his daughter every day and twice on Sunday

We have not upheld Gods intent. That is not his fault. Parents have rules and expectations for their children and often children do their own thing anyway. Sometimes the consequences our children bring about for disobedience has major consequences, and sometimes not so major consequences. Nevertheless, the disobedience is the problem, not the parent or the rule.

[CanadianJudo]

How do you know Gods intent? have you spoken to him.

[sikofit]

@Optrader

@sikofit

@Optrader

In my destruction of a Nation thread over in the RF, one of my points is that the nuclear family (i.e., father, mother and children) is under attack, and anything that undermines and destroys the family, helps destroy us as a nation.

The nuclear family as a point of stability is a farce. I would take 2 gay fathers over the father who molests his daughter every day and twice on Sunday

We have not upheld Gods intent. That is not his fault. Parents have rules and expectations for their children and often children do their own thing anyway. Sometimes the consequences our children bring about for disobedience has major consequences, and sometimes not so major consequences. Nevertheless, the disobedience is the problem, not the parent or the rule.

Did you reply to the wrong post? That in no way addressed what I posted.

[Optrader]

@komobu

@Optrader

60 plus million in 46 years and counting.

what is this "60 Million referring too? Abortions or divorces? I am kind of confused since the sentence before the statement refers to the Nuclear family being under attack. I do agree that it is BTW.

60 plus million abortions.

[Optrader]

@sikofit

@Optrader

In my destruction of a Nation thread over in the RF, one of my points is that the nuclear family (i.e., father, mother and children) is under attack, and anything that undermines and destroys the family, helps destroy us as a nation. 60 plus million in 46 years and counting.

fwiw - your understanding of what makes up a nuclear family is incorrect

nuclear family

noun

Definition of nuclear family

: a family group that consists only of parents and children

My definition is from the Bible, which predates the one you provided. Thanks for demonstrating my point.

[Optrader]

@adroit

@Optrader

If you bothered to check statisics, you’d discover that the number of times that delivering a baby would endanger the life of the mother is very small, I believe we’ll under 1%. Let’s clarify something else here too…

Carrying to term statistically imposes a much greater risk to the mother’s life than abortion. Carrying to term also comes with it a 30% chance at being gutted. If not gutted, it carries a 95% chance that the woman’s genitals will tear. There are other risks of health complications as well.

No human has the right to impose those risks on a woman.

I think I have been clear that I do not oppose life saving measures for pregnant women. Please read my post though on what I said regarding such instances.

[sikofit]

@Optrader

My definition is from the Bible, which predates the one you provided. Thanks for demonstrating my point.

I’m familiar with that poorly written piece of fiction and the words nuclear family are found nowhere within it.

[Optrader]

@sikofit

@Optrader

@sikofit

@Optrader

In my destruction of a Nation thread over in the RF, one of my points is that the nuclear family (i.e., father, mother and children) is under attack, and anything that undermines and destroys the family, helps destroy us as a nation.

The nuclear family as a point of stability is a farce. I would take 2 gay fathers over the father who molests his daughter every day and twice on Sunday

We have not upheld Gods intent. That is not his fault. Parents have rules and expectations for their children and often children do their own thing anyway. Sometimes the consequences our children bring about for disobedience has major consequences, and sometimes not so major consequences. Nevertheless, the disobedience is the problem, not the parent or the rule.

Did you reply to the wrong post? That in no way addressed what I posted.

Indeed I did. This thread has turned into one very similar in the RF. I’ll have to back check to get back on track…

[sikofit]

@Optrader

@sikofit

@Optrader

@sikofit

@Optrader

In my destruction of a Nation thread over in the RF, one of my points is that the nuclear family (i.e., father, mother and children) is under attack, and anything that undermines and destroys the family, helps destroy us as a nation.

The nuclear family as a point of stability is a farce. I would take 2 gay fathers over the father who molests his daughter every day and twice on Sunday

We have not upheld Gods intent. That is not his fault. Parents have rules and expectations for their children and often children do their own thing anyway. Sometimes the consequences our children bring about for disobedience has major consequences, and sometimes not so major consequences. Nevertheless, the disobedience is the problem, not the parent or the rule.

Did you reply to the wrong post? That in no way addressed what I posted.

Indeed I did. This thread has turned into one very similar in the RF. I’ll have to back check to get back on track…

Fair enough. I’ve done that myself before

[Optrader]

@CanadianJudo

How do you know Gods intent? have you spoken to him.

No, but he has spoken his intent through his word. It’s very clear what his intent was regarding the family.

[Optrader]

@adroit

What’s the term for being forced to endure a great amount of pain for a sustained amount of time against your will?

4 years, unless the guy is reelected.

[Optrader]

@CanadianJudo

Unless your the Pope you dont get to decide if somone is catholic or not

Joe Bidens’ Catholicism is a well established fact.

[Optrader]

@sikofit

@Optrader

My definition is from the Bible, which predates the one you provided. Thanks for demonstrating my point.

I’m familiar with that poorly written piece of fiction and the words nuclear family are found nowhere within it.

Evidently not very familiar, but I’ll grant you, the word nuclear is not in there. You can subtract it if you’d like. It’s a term that used to be in common usage meaning, father, mother and children.

[WuWei]

@RoyalBlue

@Optrader

Since I have a constitutional right to bear arms and I can’t afford to buy, where’s my government funded gun?

So government hand-outs are cool as long as you get something YOU want?

BackatCHOO