Evidence of official involvement with the assassination attempt is hiding in plain sight and is similar to this “warning label” on a grape brick during prohibition about the risk of producing illegal alcohol:
“After dissolving the brick in a gallon of water, do not place the liquid in a jug away in the cupboard for twenty days, because then it would turn into wine.”
A starting point is why was Trump allowed to take the stage and remain on the stage when there were multiple reports of Crooks scoping out the site? That included Crooks flying a drone over the site.
>
MSN
Why did the Secret Service tell local police to stay away from the roof and then leave it unguarded?
It is likely that Trump would be dead without the actions of local police, which included a local counter-sniper moving to get in a position to fire the first shot a Crooks. Why was the local sniper located so he could not view the roof to begin with?
. . . a Butler SWAT operator was the first to fire at Trump’s assassin - from 100 yards away.
The congressman said the sniper “ran towards the threat, running to a clear shot position directly into the line of fire”.
Then, in a single shot, he fired at the gunman and hit part of his rifle, the report said.
This knocked the gunman off his position temporarily, but, “after just a few seconds”, he “popped back up” before he was fatally shot by a Secret Service sharpshooter.
MSN
If history is any guide the only people who will face prosecution will be the local police who interfered with a “federal operation to protect national security” . . .
For more background information see this earlier thread:
