Taking of Crimea led to shutting off water to Crimea led to destruction of agriculture led to invasion of Ukraine. One of many lines.
Even a linear thinker can see that.
Taking of Crimea led to shutting off water to Crimea led to destruction of agriculture led to invasion of Ukraine. One of many lines.
Even a linear thinker can see that.
Taking of Crimea led to shutting off water to Crimea led to destruction of agriculture led to invasion of Ukraine. One of many lines.
Even a linear thinker can see that.
That has nothing to do with Trump withholding military aid to Ukraine.
WuWei:
Taking of Crimea led to shutting off water to Crimea led to destruction of agriculture led to invasion of Ukraine. One of many lines.
Even a linear thinker can see that.
That has nothing to do with Trump withholding military aid to Ukraine.
No, are you sure?
One surgical strike on the dam would have been a better response to that.
IMO.
One surgical strike on the dam would have been a better response to that.
IMO.
I won’t disagree, but it still would have been an act of war. And it is but one line.
why did he withhold the sale?
Why should I care? They got their weapons, way before they were invaded again so…why do you care?
JayJay:
One surgical strike on the dam would have been a better response to that.
IMO.
I won’t disagree, but it still would have been an act of war. And it is but one line.
If the Russians are being truthful, yes it’s been but one line.
The other main line is they want the land bridge to Crimea and pretty much complete control of the Black Sea. And it shows their resolve to keep Ukraine out of NATO.
Will be interesting to see what their response is if Finland and Sweden decide to join NATO.
Not “it’s been”, “it is”.
There are multiple lines-reasons. A strike on the damn would have resolved but one, temporarily at best. The Ukrainians probably would have rebuilt in a week and the EU would have paid for it.
The other main line is they want the land bridge to Crimea and pretty much complete control of the Black Sea. And it shows their resolve to keep Ukraine out of NATO.
Two other lines. Not resolvable by a strike on a damn.
JayJay:
The other main line is they want the land bridge to Crimea and pretty much complete control of the Black Sea. And it shows their resolve to keep Ukraine out of NATO.
Two other lines. Not resolvable by a strike on a damn.
Yep.
The truth of the matter is the only way this is going to be resolved is by a deal, but the situation has progressed to a point where that’s not possible…yet.
Or else Ukraine will be pummeled to hell.
Complexity be like that.
Yes. Trump with held the aid to try to get zelensky to investigate Biden.
Why should you care that your POTUS used his position to advance his political ambitions at the expense of a ally?
No reason.
Why should you care that your POTUS used his position to advance his political ambitions at the expense of a ally?
What expense to an ally was incurred?
Yes. Trump with held the aid to try to get zelensky to investigate Biden.
Good.
Good.
lol.
Awesome. So you think it’s good to use the power of the presidency to blackmail allies to investigate your opponents for political gain!
■■■■■■■ awesome!
Sure, pretty much anything to keep progs out of power.
Wonder if it will be transitory.
That (D)epends.
Sure, pretty much anything to keep progs out of power.
Gosh, you love trump so much you let him wipe himself with the constitution and you cheer him on.
Just another rule of law conservative captivated by the ■■■■■ grabber.