I don’t think so. I would put money on Trump having paid for an abortion.
Just because it’s legal doesn’t mean it’s not murder.
Yes it does mean it’s not murder.
mur·der
ˈmərdər/Submit
noun
1.
the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
“the stabbing murder of an off-Broadway producer”
synonyms: killing, homicide, assassination, liquidation, extermination, execution, slaughter, butchery, massacre;
verb
1.
kill (someone) unlawfully and with premeditation.
“somebody tried to murder Joe”
synonyms: kill, put to death, assassinate, execute, liquidate, eliminate, dispatch, butcher, slaughter, massacre, wipe out;
I mean it’s not murder, but luckily only the legality matters.
Then where are the baby’s right’s? What did it do to warrant it’s life being ended? Looks like it fits the definition just fine.
Some pro-baby killers would argue that because it’s legal, it’s not murder. Luckily it’s not your interpretation that matters in regards to what defines murder.
What rights? A fetus doesn’t have any rights. Only the mother does.
And that’s both the facts AND the law.
A two-fer!
Some pro-baby killers would argue that because it’s legal, it’s not murder. Luckily it’s not your interpretation that matters in regards to what defines murder.
Would you put a woman to death who got an abortion?
So would you kill a two-year-old because you don’t want them and they are minors, thus don’t have any rights under the law? Do you know how stupid your argument sounds?
SaysWho:You are correct. But a mistake by Avenatti does not mean that he doesn’t know that Trump paid for an abortion. He is strongly implying that and has no reason to do so unless he knows it’s true.
Meh. I would not get too riled up just yet. Avenatti is a publicity hound. He knows how to generate buzz and interest, and he is building a brand right now off of his time in the spotlight. He can drop hints at all kinds of things, but without some semblance of fact, it is all wild innuendo and speculation.
Besides, I am pretty sure that either he or Daniels have stated that she did not have an abortion or a pregnancy as a result of her one sexual encounter with Trump. So, who else does Avenatti know that could have been the recipient of said abortion?
I think he’s spoken with more women who have been unfortunate enough to enter Trump’s sexual orbit.
I would certainly give her life in prison. As well as the “doctor” who performed the abortion.
So would you kill a two-year-old because you don’t want them and they are minors, thus don’t have any rights under the law? Do you know how stupid your argument sounds?
That’s not my argument, so no, I wouldn’t kill a two-year-old.
I would certainly give her life in prison. As well as the “doctor” who performed the abortion.
And that’s why you’ll never win. We will never be a country that jails women for abortion.
But they are the same thing- They’re both children, just in different stages of development. A baby has rights as a human being. Period.
You keep thinking that.
NebraskaFootball: SaysWho:You are correct. But a mistake by Avenatti does not mean that he doesn’t know that Trump paid for an abortion. He is strongly implying that and has no reason to do so unless he knows it’s true.
Meh. I would not get too riled up just yet. Avenatti is a publicity hound. He knows how to generate buzz and interest, and he is building a brand right now off of his time in the spotlight. He can drop hints at all kinds of things, but without some semblance of fact, it is all wild innuendo and speculation.
Besides, I am pretty sure that either he or Daniels have stated that she did not have an abortion or a pregnancy as a result of her one sexual encounter with Trump. So, who else does Avenatti know that could have been the recipient of said abortion?
I think he’s spoken with more women who have been unfortunate enough to enter Trump’s sexual orbit.
Perhaps. But without something more than his inaccurate assertion on Morning Joe, there is nothing here to really discuss in this regard.
But they are the same thing- They’re both children, just in different stages of development. A baby has rights as a human being. Period.
2nd amendment rights?
Strawman. We are talking about whether an unborn child has the right to life, not the right to own a weapon.
children, just in different stages of development. A baby has rights as a human being. Period.
No, they are not. A fetus is not a baby. I suggest you take an Intro to Biology class.
I suggest you take an intro to biology course. I have. I’ve also taken Anatomy, Physiology, Microbiology, and Genetics.
Strawman. We are talking about whether an unborn child has the right to life, not the right to own a weapon.
An unborn “child” does not have the right to life. Not legally. Not biologically. Nor morally.