It’s not my idea.
You picked up the “oligarchy” talking point from somewhere. You probably don’t know what it means.
Maybe only land owners should get the vote.
or males.or only white people.
I thought we did away with this kind of thinking years ago.
I guess not.
Caveman thinking under Trump.
anyway to keep power away from certain voters who shall remain nameless…LOL
Allan
Jezcoe:Maybe only land owners should get the vote.
or males.or only white people.
I thought we did away with this kind of thinking years ago.
I guess not.
Caveman thinking under Trump.
anyway to keep power away from certain voters who shall remain nameless…LOL
Allan
On a hunch I googled H.L.Hunt+John Birch.
I wasn’t surprised or disappointed.
You picked up the “oligarchy” talking point from somewhere. You probably don’t know what it means.
No… it isn’t a talking point. Quite a strange allegation to make that I need some “talking point” to counter some rich dead weirdo’s plan to solidify the political power of the rich.
His problem is that he wasn’t thinking big enough. His fellow Birchers, the Koch brothers, really figured out how to do it.
So you want people to hate the wealthy even more?
That’s a garbage plan.
An 18 year old is just as much a citizen as a 25 year old.
When it comes to the vote, all citizens are equal. Each citizen gets one vote. That’s all. No more, no less.
The poor and middle class have done most of the fighting and dying in all of America’s wars.
The lower classes sacrifice as well.
I disagree with anybody getting more than one vote. But if the wealthy only represent the top 1 - 2 % of the population then giving them an extra vote wouldn’t make that much of a difference, right?
That’s a garbage plan.
An 18 year old is just as much a citizen as a 25 year old.
When it comes to the vote, all citizens are equal. Each citizen gets one vote. That’s all. No more, no less.
Each citizen gets as many votes as the law says they do. If this became an amendment them they would get more than one vote.
Your wiki is showing…
No, we already rejected poll taxes and those were instituted under the same reasons. Flat out no.
What we need is a citizenship test.
Good luck with this plan. It goes against all principles of democracy. It also favors Democrats.
Those who take more than they give should have their vote withheld until they give more than they take. Then they get their votes back…all of them from the past as well. Incentive to be productive.
Defense contractors benefit from those expenditures.
How would you define “taking”? That’s very vague.
Those who take more than they give should have their vote withheld until they give more than they take. Then they get their votes back…all of them from the past as well. Incentive to be productive.
In would be fine with kicking old people off the voter rolls also.
How would you define “taking”? That’s very vague.
Yeah. It is an evolving concept that needs further definition.
Good luck with this plan. It goes against all principles of democracy. It also favors Democrats.
I know it does. The lefties who have posted on this thread have been too stupid to pick up on that.