🤣 Voter Suppression! Jim Crow!

[WuWei]

@conan

It’s OK to admit you’re wrong.

Or a sheep.

[PurpnGold]

@conan

I’m not the one that needs white elites snobs to lead me.

Have you ever voted, ever?

They are ALL white elitist snobs… with one notable exception

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

Are you really trying to claim that white, racist republicans from Georgia are so bad at writing voter suppression laws that they broke records for voter turnout?

Or or or…

That despite clear reduction in access to voting… people overcame it anyway to vote in record numbers?

Is that also possible?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@conan

I’m not the one that needs white elites snobs to lead me.

That’s going to leave a mark.

Imagine co-signing this and voting in a presidential election for the last 40-50 years

[SixFoot]

@conan

It’s OK to admit you’re wrong.

It’s OK to be white too, but we all saw how libs freaked out over that one.

[Smyrna]

@PurpnGold

Can’t both be true? Is it possible to have laws and policies on the books that are meant to suppress the vote AND STILL have increased voter turnout?

That’s like saying slavery was ineffective because some slaves managed to escape.

@SixFoot

Crazy people think they’re sane.

Stupid people think they’re intellectuals.

This post was even more appropriate in this thread.

[PurpnGold]

@Smyrna

@PurpnGold

Can’t both be true? Is it possible to have laws and policies on the books that are meant to suppress the vote AND STILL have increased voter turnout?

That’s like saying slavery was ineffective because some slaves managed to escape.

@SixFoot

Crazy people think they’re sane.

Stupid people think they’re intellectuals.

This post was even more appropriate in this thread.

Use your words…

Are you denying that something can be suppressive and still result in increases?

[conan]

@PurpnGold

They are ALL white elitist snobs… with one notable exception

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@conan

I’m not the one that needs white elites snobs to lead me.

Have you ever voted, ever?

They are ALL white elitist snobs… with one notable exception

Fat Stacy?

[Smyrna]

@PurpnGold

Are you denying that

…the outcome was NOT as what you and almost every other lib and lib media site suggested?

[SixFoot]

Suppress - To curtail or prohibit the activities of.

Increase - To make greater or larger.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@conan

I’m not the one that needs white elites snobs to lead me.

Have you ever voted, ever?

They are ALL white elitist snobs… with one notable exception

Fat Stacy?

Sure.

Have you ever voted for a President in the last 50 years?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

Are you really trying to claim that white, racist republicans from Georgia are so bad at writing voter suppression laws that they broke records for voter turnout?

Or or or…

That despite clear reduction in access to voting… people overcame it anyway to vote in record numbers?

Is that also possible?

Or or or…

There was no reduction in access to voting and the predictions and cries of racism were all hogwash?

That if they “overcame”, it wasn’t suppression? Is that possible.

“Record numbers of voters is not proof the vote wasn’t suppressed!”

Listen to yourself, you sound like Trump.

The House of Lies was built on CRT sand and now it’s washing away is a sea equality; not equity.

Say goodbye to those “heady advances”…

[PurpnGold]

@Smyrna

@PurpnGold

Are you denying that

…the outcome was NOT as what you and almost every other lib and lib media site suggested?

I bet it wasn’t the outcome Georgia Republican lawmakers expected either.

Doesn’t mean that they didn’t intend to curtail (aka suppress) voting in Georgia. The reduced the number of voting options, that is a fact.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Are you denying that something can be suppressive and still result in increases?

Let’s use your piss poor attempted gun analogy - if I put a suppressor on my rifle and it makes it louder, is it a suppressor?

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

There was no reduction in access to voting and the predictions and cries of racism were all hogwash?

Georgia didn’t reduce access to voting options?

Then what were their new laws meant to do? Nothing?

If you had a gun shop next door and now the nearest gun shop is 100 miles away due to Texas government action… was your gun purchasing options limited, reduced, suppressed?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@conan

I’m not the one that needs white elites snobs to lead me.

Have you ever voted, ever?

They are ALL white elitist snobs… with one notable exception

Fat Stacy?

Sure.

Have you ever voted for a President in the last 50 years?

Yep. A couple of times.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

There was no reduction in access to voting and the predictions and cries of racism were all hogwash?

Georgia didn’t reduce access to voting options?

Then what were their new laws meant to do? Nothing?

If you had a gun shop next door and now the nearest gun shop is 100 miles away due to Texas government action… was your gun purchasing options limited, reduced, suppressed?

No. I know how to work the internet. Like BIPOC do.

[WuWei]

Switch. “Intend”.

A weak one.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Are you denying that something can be suppressive and still result in increases?

Let’s use your piss poor attempted gun analogy - if I put a suppressor on my rifle and it makes it louder, is it a suppressor?

If the manufacturer developed it to be a suppressor and it didn’t actually suppress… then it is a defective suppressor.

But that wasn’t my gun analogy. I wasn’t talking about a gun accessory and it’s function. I was talking about reduction in access to a gun being suppressive.

Even you would admit that.