Voter Intimidation

[Ben_Natuf]

victim? lol

[e7alr]

@Supreme_War_Pig

@e7alr

@Supreme_War_Pig

@e7alr

Seems you are focused on the other observers, rather than watching the voting.

Because there is no problem with the voting. It is a lie conjured from petulance, fever dreams, and conspiracy.

Meanwhile these MAGA monitors are real.

And law enforcement reports that they are following the law and simply observing. But you want folks to go there and focus on them because you don’t like what they represent.

No, I want folks to go there and keep them in line.

I don’t give a whit for what they represent.

Besides, my observors are just as legal as your observers. That is what you don’t like. Intimidation is much less effective if the victim has back up.

That would be law enforcement’s job, not yours. This sounds an awful lot like when someone plans to go on campus and a bunch of progs show up to keep them inline. And observers of the vote are fine, but again your not talking about observing the voting.

[conan]

@Supreme_War_Pig

Because there is no problem with the voting . It is a lie conjured from petulance, fever dreams, and conspiracy.

Meanwhile these MAGA monitors are real.

Do they make libs nerviest?

[tnt]

@Ben_Natuf

do i care?

well, you posted the video as if it was important, so I don’t know…do you?

do you know whey those two guys were there? Or are you just a RW media parrot?

[tnt]

@Ben_Natuf

no, i care enough to display the hypocrisy.

if a person lets someone intimidate them, its their problem. man up.

this whole notion of needing government to protect our rights from other citizens is insane, its the government we need to protect our rights from.

lol. so yeah, you didn’t watch the video.

on brother.

[FloridaYankee]

@e7alr

@FloridaYankee

@e7alr

@FloridaYankee

@conan

What was that that libs said back in 08?..when Obama was running and there were armed Blacks guarding voting location…oh yeah suck it up buttercups. They weren’t breaking any laws. Even Eric Holder office said they weren’t doing anything illegal.

Well it appears neither were they.

“Deputies responded and were able to determine that the individuals were not breaking any laws and were more than 75 feet away from the ballot box as required by law. MCSO will continue to work with our local, state and federal partners to ensure a safe and just election process for everyone,” Sgt. Calbert Gillett said in an email to Insider.

Well the whole ■■■■■■■ thing sucks. Every time I go to vote I’m on high alert just practically begging someone to ■■■■ with me so I can body slam them. While much of that is on me, it’s jack asses pulling these stunts at polling places that are at the root of it.

It takes dedication and practice to keep a chip balanced for long periods of time. What happens when the person balancing the chip gets tired of waiting for people more than 75 feet away, in the public square, to knock it off his shoulder.

Don’t know, what?

I’m asking you, as you are the one, who in your own words, are on alert and practically begging for something to happen so you can body slam someone.

For someone to interfere with my rights at the voting booth. Or anywhere else for that matter, but it seems to be more a possibility at the voting booth than it ever has before.

[bigtwnvin]

@WuWei

The idea of a gun intimidates you. Seeing a gun. You walk around armed people all day long.

Not until I moved to S Florida and took a CWP class did I realize how true that statement really is.

[DougBH]

Does having a certified poll watcher serve any purpose? I’d it does, what is the substitute for a certified poll watcher at a drop box?

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@DougBH

Does having a certified poll watcher serve any purpose?

Not a real purpose.

@DougBH

I’d it does, what is the substitute for a certified poll watcher at a drop box?

Rejection of the big lie.

[DougBH]

Maybe one real purpose of a certified poll watcher is/was to prevent intimidation at a real voting location.
The substitute seems to make an unverifiable complaint after the fact. Or to actually be intimidated.

[JayJay]

@DougBH

Does having a certified poll watcher serve any purpose? I’d it does, what is the substitute for a certified poll watcher at a drop box?

a) A certified poll watcher at a polling place is a real thing,
b) A certified poll watcher at a drop box is not a real thing. It doesn’t exist. And it’s not where the ballot is validated anyway. Any more than a mailbox is.

[DougBH]

C) the person said they were intimidated at a drop box. If that is a real problem, maybe it could have been solved if they had gone to a voting booth with a certified poll watcher. Maybe people knew what they were doing when voting was like that.

[JayJay]

@DougBH

C) the person said they were intimidated at a drop box. If that is a real problem, maybe it could have been solved if they had gone to a voting booth with a certified poll watcher. Maybe people knew what they were doing when voting was like that.

Why do I expect nothing but silliness from you anymore?

Your whole schtick is to try and defend bad behavior at all costs by contorting it so it’s not bad behavior…and you blame the victim instead.

“You know…if only that woman hadn’t worn the revealing clothing in the bar…she wouldn’t have been assaulted. Most women know better”.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@JayJay

@DougBH

Does having a certified poll watcher serve any purpose? I’d it does, what is the substitute for a certified poll watcher at a drop box?

a) A certified poll watcher at a polling place is a real thing,
b) A certified poll watcher at a drop box is not a real thing. It doesn’t exist. And it’s not where the ballot is validated anyway. Any more than a mailbox is.

That is a good point, that I overlooked. Thank you.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@DougBH

Maybe one real purpose of a certified poll watcher is/was to prevent intimidation at a real voting location.
The substitute seems to make an unverifiable complaint after the fact. Or to actually be intimidated.

C’mon man. Nobody was complaining about intimidation at drop boxes. This was born of The Big Lie, for which you have fallen

[DougBH]

“C’mon man. Nobody was complaining about intimidation at lock boxes.”

Please read the thread title.

I am not sure what someone harassing someone at a drop box has to do with a big lie. I suggested that people knew what they were doing when they set up secure polling places with poll watchers. Apparently this didn’t fit with the intended theme and has flipped a couple of lib posters out.
Not my problem.

[Supreme_War_Pig]

@DougBH

“C’mon man. Nobody was complaining about intimidation at lock boxes.”

Please read the thread title.

I took your post to mean the ballot watchers in the OP were there in response to intimidation that didn’t exist.

@DougBH

I am not sure what someone harassing someone at a drop box has to do with a big lie.

Well, they are there because of the big lie. Our elections are secure, but a petulant man baby told you otherwise, and you chose to believe it.

[DougBH]

You are making stupid assumptions of what I meant and what I believe. That makes it hard to take you seriously.
I meant exactly what I said. No more, no less.

[WuWei]

@Supreme_War_Pig

Nobody was complaining about intimidation at drop boxes.

Is that not the whole op?

[Ben_Natuf]

@JayJay

And it’s not where the ballot is validated anyway

validating a fraudulent ballot after the fact does not make it not fraudulent. therein lies the problem. validating a ballot is basically checking a name off a list. there is no way to conclude if the person actually put the ballot in the box.