Given the demonstrated violence on January 6th by some rioters, they is a valid concern for the officers safety.

WW

The burly police officer should have arrested her or warned her she would be shot if she continued. Instead he ambushed her without any apparent warning.

Protestors interrupted the Kavanaugh hearings and occupied the Senate office building. No one shot them. I doubt any of them got more than a small fine for trespassing.

2 Likes

Where?

Where?

1 Like

And many of you would be faced with a quandarry:

Point out she was high on drugs so as to maintain consistency?
Or still support her because she was a Trump supporter?

Oh wait…many of you have that problem now…

Sorry. I will clarify, a report on the DC Medical examiners findings is available to read. There were multiple outlets that covered the released information.

However, autopsy reports are not public record and are only available to next of kin.

Thanks. I should have put a /s on my post.

The details of the medical examiner report apparently are still a state secret:

https://www.cnsnews.com/article/washington/elisabeth-nieshalla/judicial-watch-sues-obtain-records-fatal-shooting-ashli

Autopsy reports are not public. They are only available to next of kin.

This is another publicity stunt by judicial watch. They know they have no legal right to view the report.

Is that only a risk in this case? Or should all questionable shootings be covered up?

2 Likes

Given the FBI’s long history of entrapment and setting up patsies we need to view statements from federal officials and mainstream media with a great deal of skepticism.

As the old Russian saying goes, “there is no news in truth and no truth in news”.

American exceptionalism has come to mean that Americans are exceptionally gullible and stupid.

No kidding. That’s how we got Trump**

WW

1 Like

Actually it is why we continue to believe corporate media that spew FBI/CIA propaganda. Most of the world has a much more cynical view of the so-called news. Russians are no exception.

My observation is that frequently the most accurate news about Russia comes from VOA and the most accurate news about the US comes from RT. It is as if most of the media in both countries under the control of oligarchs in bed with the state.

State controlled does not mean state owned.

Yes…that is the only risk and if you could see his face everyone would know who he is.

Where? You mean a report by the media?

Never seems to be an issue in any other shooting.

1 Like

If it’s on video, the internet is gonna figure out who you are. Not possible in this case.

Why not?

Can you see his face?

You think that’s the only camera?