180

And as I pointed out that IS NOT ALL that is being slammed in this thread. Y’all have been bouncing back and forth between he can’t even reveal where they are to he posted their faces.

If you want to go with the argument that everyone here is just saying that this is “unusual” and nothing more, well you just have your little fantasy.

181

Brian Bennett
Senior White House Correspondent
Time magazine

Pool Report

https://publicpool.kinja.com/subject-pool-report-1-trump-in-iraq-1831325199

182

lol - Can you not read my posts. They clearly says he should not be posting there faces and location while they are still deployed there.

Nobody is bouncing except you. The idiot you linked to described it as “unusual”. And he’s a moron on your side of this. The rest of us are telling you point blank that the reason your guy says it’s “unusual” is because it is not supposed to ■■■■■■■ be done.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

183

Wesley S Morgan, the Politico Military Affairs reporter, registered in DC as a Democrat is on my side?

:rofl:

Oh my!

184

The next president is going to need to go on an apology tour.

1 Like
185

Stop posting facts. There is an enemy of the people to rail on, and a Crown to defend at all costs here.

186

Blame the men and women serving to defend a sleazy politician. Fascinating.

187

Gotcha. Thanks for the correction.

188

Now that you’ve reach the lowest point you can go, what’s left? Telling me I don’t support the member of my family who serve including the one who just returned from Afghanistan a few months ago?

It was an observation that if the men knew they were “covert” (which there seems to be quite a bit of information stating otherwise) there is no way they would knowingly put themselves in a compromising position.

Sorry, but I will listen to the .mil and former .mil I follow rather than some anon internet forum poster.

Have a nice day.

189

I was not the one who made the suggestion that it was the men and women in uniform’s fault, in order to defend the President. But you have a pleasant day as well.

190

The facts were from Trump, not an internet poster.

191

If you’re talking the pool report it was written by a Time Mag reporter.

192

You run with that sweetie. Be sure to personally attack my intelligence again also. That may up your credibility.

What you think I did, is not in fact reality.

193

I’m sorry you feel as if I am attacking you in any fashion. There is no need to be so emotionally invested. It is only politics.

194

You are attributing something to me that I did not do, which is blame the troops.

I could do the same by stating you think the troops are too stupid to know they shouldn’t pose for pics when they are on a “covert” mission. I however, do not think that was your intent.

195

Here is the exchange including the post you wrote in which I replied…

Who does your post attempt to assign fault to, if not the people who “stepped in for a photo?” You can now claim that was not your intention, which is fine. So who else did you mean to assign blame to then, if not the men and women in uniform who “shouldn’t have stepped in for a photo?”

2 Likes
196

I’m not playing your game. I know what my intent was. You trying to assign something else to it, is on you.

197

Why would roosevelt invite reporters into a room with classified documents laying around?

198

You don’t think our enemies have twitter? They couldn’t see the pics posted there, and figure out who the soldiers were with?

199

I don’t believe seeking clarification is a game. But if you think it is, then okay I guess.