Victoria Nuland's sudden departure raises questions

Victoria Nuland, the State Department’s architect of the 2014 coup and the war in Ukraine, retired unexpected a few days ago. She and her husband, Robert Kagen, are known as an uber-neocons.

Before taking over the lead on Ukraine, Nuland was Dick Cheney’s foreign policy advisor during the 2003 Iraq War and aftermath. Glenn Greenwald noted the “singular monstrousness of Victoria Nuland and her bipartisan, blood-stained, ghoulish career…"

The circumstances of her sudden retirement have raised speculation that she was forced out to avoid escalation of a war with Russia:

“My best guess here is that the CIA and the Defense Department and the NSA got this message around saying, ‘look, Victoria’s got her own agenda here,’” said McGovern.

The former CIA official continued to speculate: “‘The president doesn’t really want to strike these ammo depots in Russia or knock down the [Crimean] Bridge. So we got to rein her in, I guess it’s time for her to go to early retirement.’”
‘We Got To Rein Her In’: Behind The Scenes Of Nuland’s Early Retirement – ScheerPost

Nuland was recently passed over for a promotion to the number two spot at the State Department. Her departure may also be a recognition that opportunities in neocon think tanks or on the board of directors for military contractors could be more attractive.

Does Nuland’s history in both Democrat and Republican administrations show that US foreign policy is largely independent of election results?

Of course, the real question is who will get her broom now that events in Ukraine have thrown water on her career plans?

From what I’ve heard, she retired because she didn’t get the Deputy SoS job she wanted.

She’ll have an office on K Street (or in downtown Rosslyn) as soon as the statutory time limits run out, if there are any.

(K Street is where the big law/lobbying firms are, and downtown Rosslyn is where the big defense contractors are)

Of course, the primary reason why she did get the promotion may well be the miserable failure of her policies in Ukraine.

Normally Washington promotes failure and corruption. Nuland’s departure is a rare reversal of the normal pattern.

1 Like

Who cares?

Doesn’t really raise any questions for me. People get passed over for promotions all the time. Sometimes they get miffed because of it.

Not sure what the great mystery here is. I’ve had employees I’ve had to pass over for promotion during my career because there was another candidate more suited for the job. I tried to do everything I could to find some alternative way to reward their hard work, but sometimes your best as a manager isn’t good enough. In those cases, I always tried to make sure we parted on the best terms possible and tried to make the transition as smooth as possible.

1 Like

Given her failure in Iraq, the real question is why Nuland was given the lead in project Ukraine to begin with?

There are plenty of grieving relatives of dead conscripts in Ukraine who care about what her policies have done to their country.

1 Like

Oh no… that miserable hack Glenn Greenwald has concerns.

1 Like

Yes, we need to blindly trust our masters who have promoted the Russia-collusion hoax, the unprovoked-invasion hoax, the Ukraine-is-winning hoax as the pretext for war with Russia.